I look back at the 2010 season and the great run we had in the 2nd half of the season and I wonder if one or two more losses against teams that probably had nothing to play for, would have cost us an at-large bid? I'm specifically talking about playing UNO near the end of the season. They had NOTHING to play for and we went to New Orleans and swept them to earn a conference co-championship. One or two more losses, especially in SBC play, may have meant no conference co-championship, which would have hurt our chances at an at-large bid. Would you say that those games had a lot riding on them against teams that had nothing to play for AND we won those games?
The sensationalism with the bolded comment you made speaks volumes about how you tend to focus on the negatives, or on losses, and not the positives, or on wins. I'm sure there were several games this season where our opposition was supposed to win, but lost to us.