But as someone just said, the RPI slate has been wiped clean...and we can now prove the experts wrong.
igeaux.mobi
But as someone just said, the RPI slate has been wiped clean...and we can now prove the experts wrong.
igeaux.mobi
No. The Cajuns did enough of that (winning on the field). What they missed was scheduling better. And scheduling better does not mean bringing in higher RPI teams or better teams for that matter. It means scheduling smarter.
Meanwhile, the point I am trying to make does not entail looking back on this year and anguishing over what may have been lost. I am making these points such that hopefully we can do better in the future.
Brian
Even at the end of the season -looking back- utter domination (even if expected) should not be totally ignored.
14 - 0 (W) 5 inn.
20 - 0 (W) 5 inn.
14 - 1 (W) 5 inn.
28 - 0 (W) 5 inn.
A better system would be "Did you do, what you should have done, based on who you played?"
Geaux Cajuns
Point taken.
I know it shouldn't be the way it is...but it is. We are not Arizona or Washington or UCLA. We CANNOT hand the powers that be ANY reasons to discount our worthiness. Wins such as those is why a team with 6 or 8 fewer wins will get the nod over us...and it doesn't help that, in addition, our RPI is lower.
igeaux.mobi
On a basic leval UL was penalized for playing to many games.
igeaux.mobi
And we weren't any better last season #23 RPI. No matter how times it's repeated the end results are similar to seeding teams. Third team in at 23 RPI and third team in at #38 RPI. The end result is the same, to continue to argue that what is very clear evidence in my book is illogical. The process is flawed and its not just UL.
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)