I guarantee that is the last thing YG wants. She can't beat the LADY CAJUNS (Premiere SOftball team in LA by far) in her litter box park in Baton Rouge, she couldnt' win a Regional at Lady Cajun park when she was coaching here. The sport passed YG by about 3-4 years ago.
GEAUX UL!
I've spent a lot of time researching and reviewing baseball & softball post season selections etc. I do not believe the selection committee gives any credence to the polls. The amount of data they have available to them is very large and much more relevant than other peoples opinions.
If you see Scott Farmer ask him if he has ever had the polls come up during a selection committee meeting. I'll ask if I see him.
Who is the contracting company for the ballpark
I don't think they do either, but at the same time if they are on the committee they will pay attention to the sport all year. This includes looking at polls. If they were not they didn't take their job seriously. But they do.
Now then, once in the selection room and for the first time they see name (a) who is not ranked as opposed to team (b) who they have seen in the polls all year . . . the constant year long reminder can only be an advantage. Even if it is only subliminal.
jmo
igeaux.mobi
I follow both sports pretty closely. I have looked at one baseball poll this year and none of the softball polls.
I think your premise is flawed a bit. If they are doing their job there isn't a team they "see for the first time" in the selection room.
My point is this. The general public has available to them the polls in an easy to obtain format. If they want more than that they have to start digging around.
The selection committee on the other hand has available to them a mass of data provided by the NCAA statistician on a regular basis during the season. It increases as the season nears an end. The polls aren't part of that data. The NCAA softball championship handbook spells it out the criteria below.
Primary Criteria• Ratings Percentage Index (25% the institution’s winning percentage; 50% opponents’ success; 25% opponents’ strength of schedule); also bonus points forwins against the top 50 teams and penalty points for losses against the teams 225 and above.
• Head-to-head competition.
• Results of the RPI
--record against ranked teams 1-25; 26-50, 51-100; 101-150;
--average RPI win;
--average RPI loss.• Results versus common opponents.• End of season results
• Significant wins and losses.
That is a lot of data for a lot of teams. Not a lot of poll watching time left.
Fans watch polls. NCAA selection committee members watch data.
There is a reason advertisers run their commercials over and over.
For top of mind awareness, it works.
Being ranked in the polls is a nationally broadcast commercial.
It can't hurt, it can only help.
jmo
igeaux.mobi
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)