OK now that I actually read the article, yes University of Greater New Orleans. Sounds awful I would not want to graduate from there
I don't think that the move is racially motivated as SUNO indicates, but there is something going on. I think that budget money allocated to each system and when cuts are concerned really come into play. It's strange. It's been said for some time now that we have too many 4 year universities, yet the LSU system grows with LSU-A becoming a 4 year university and they want to expel 2 other universities, or at least diminish their roles, that don't share the LSU name. In fairness, Ryan did say that UNO needed to leave the LSU system. But what damage will Lombardi do before this step might occur. Just the conspiracy coming out in me.
If a name change does take place, who now has authority to make that change? The LSU System changed LSUNO to UNO. The then Board of Colleges and Universities changed Louisiana Polytechnic College (or whatever their name was) to Louisiana Tech University and the University of Southwestern Louisiana to the University of Louisiana, only to have our name overturned stating that only the state legislature could rename a university, so we were back to USL. Years later, UL became UL Lafayette and NLU became ULM. So, today, did the legislature give authority to the UL System to change a university's name or is it still the legislature? Is there EVER a chance that we can ever get the "at Lafayette" dropped. Could UNO-SUNO be changed to UL at New Orleans?
I did particularly like the other references to LSU as LSU A&M and LSU-Baton Rouge.
The motivation is money, more for the LSU system, less for the UL system. If any plan comes from Baton Rouge, then you know it's not good for UL or any other state Univ, always for the benefit of LSU.
Fast forward 26 years . . . not only can the Board of Regents rename schools, they can open, close and merge them as well.
Oh wait I almost forgot, the Board of Regents always had that right. There was just this one single day in 1984 when this right didn't exist.
I know, I know, since 84 there is the needed rubber stamp vote.
igeaux.mobi
Fun, I respect you a lot, but I have to ask you to look deeper.
UNO is built to house and educate 17k students. That means bonds were passed to build buildings, facilities, and fixed overhead for that number. Now UNO has 11k students. The primary funding to pay the bonds, facilities, and overhead comes from the formula you mention, tuition and fees per student . Now that the formula per student does not change, tuition and fees but the overhead remains. LSUS THUS HAS to make up the void. If I am wrong great, but that void has to be made up and it is not from the state's general funds.
Somone who I respect a lot works for UNO has told me that each university is responsible to meet their overhead costs which include the things I mention. Now he may be wrong, but if not then the ULS will have to absorb the UNO deficits.
I can't see how they would expect UL System schools to absorb UNO's losses, and you can bet every school in the System would scream Bloody Murder if someone tried to do that.
When the other schools in the state have had shortfalls, the Leg covered them. They didn't like it, but they covered them. That's why Bonds have to be approved by the Regents, because I believe the State is responsible if a school defaults.
But then, how many buildings at UNO are bonded? Most of them were built by state gov't.
Well the timing is amazing... Ryan says it, Jindal moves within weeks. May be it's a coincidence.
It's not racial, SUNO is simply not a strong school.
BTW, I'm the lone voice here, but I do not think Louisiana has too many 4 year colleges.
I think we don't have enough GOOD 4 year colleges.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)