While this is definitely true at the professional level it's not necesserily true at the college level. Vince Young, Michael Vick, Tim Tebowe, Charlie Ward, Colt McCoy, Pat White, Roger Starbauch, Tommie Frasier are some of the greatest college quarterbacks. I believe that if we want to run a true spread offensive then rule number 1 is our quarterback has to be the best player on the field period. No offense to Masson but he is not a spread quarterback. I too have faith in our coaching staff and I believe Masson will be starting in Stillwater but I also think he won't have to much room for error because he has a few really athletic guys behind him.
Chris Mason may have more wiggle room than you think…
We haven’t even mentioned Brad Maguire, Brady Thomas, and Blake Hollingsworth 3 very good QB’s? Be aware that nowadays defenses can stop any running QB if he doesn’t have the little passing thing down pat. The spread attack or west coast offense is based on throwing the ball first with safety outlets in the bubbles and underneath should the need arise.
I do challenge all to take in a practice or two and watch these young men work out. IMHO: Even with Sunday’s performances, the rotation order at QB is in order with what I’ve witnessed and what the Cajuns need to be successful. Our Cajuns have one of the best and deepest receiving corps around, object being to let them run with the ball after catching it downfield and allowing whomever the QB is to live for another play!
This is the kind of offense that keeps on producing with any of the QB’s behind the ball and not built around one persons running ability!
Love ya Cajuns.
Saying we have one of the best receiving corps is a tad outlandish after the amount of drops we've had the past couple of years. There's a lot of talent there, but they need to catch the ball in games before you say that.
I don't know what offense you have been watching, but the one I saw was still a basic spread offense with a few twists thrown in. The spread offense is definitely predicated on having a dual threat QB. That means by necessity & design he will have to run the ball as well as throw it.
Being a good spread QB doesn't necessarily have anything to do with athleticism. It obviously helps to have a QB who has the ability to move around and make plays with his legs also, the spread is run in many ways. We will likely incorporate more traditional sets along with a spread passing attack. In this case, I'd think a QB who knows an offense, progressions and has accuracy will trump the others. Our passing attack will likely use a lot of shorter routes, screens and variation. I'm not sure why you suggest that Masson is not a good spread QB but he has been our most consistent option the past several years and has really produced when healthy. I do like the fact that we have some good depth at the position but its anybody's guess as to who will truly start next year.
And injuries also derailed the year with us not being able to keep Desormeaux or Babb healthy for large portions of the year. When Desormeaux was out with injury, we didn't have anybody behind him with the skills he had along with the balance in the offense to sustain success.
As a word of caution, temper that enthusiasm as Bates was arguably our most inconsistent lineman last year although that was hard to notice as the entire group underachieved. Let's let him and the rest of this unit get an entire offseason in before we crown them anything. I do think they will be improved but I want to see them do this over a longer trial period.
Kyle, not necessarily. It depends on how you structure the offense. The spread is very versatile and is able to be molded to the strengths of an offense's personnel. Houston runs a very pass heavy spread attack while Tulsa, Nevada, ECU etc.. run a very balanced version where they allow the QB to beat teams with their legs. BTW, Masson is very agile and has better speed than most give him credit for. He's had many nice runs and and is able to really hurt teams with his legs if called upon although he'd rather pass the ball. He can fit this system nicely.
igeaux.mobi
Can I throw my 2cents? Mason looked pretty good last year when he had time to throw. However, he was very poor when pressure came up the middle. Once he was running for his life he rarely made a positive play. Going on history I think our OL will be weak again. I think a QB who can make something out of nothing will be needed to consistently move the chains. Blaine may not be the guy, but I think UL will need a superior athlete at the QB position until they can get a legitimate starting 5 up front.
We had a few problems the past years that look to be working out right now.
Again go watch these guys workout and I'm sure it will not look "outlandish" what so ever.
The QB's are doing better day in and day out getting the ball to the receivers. Coach Hud counts the catches in a row during drills and we are now up to 36 in a row before a drop or under/over throw.
Love ya Cajuns....
Keep watching, we are in the first few weeks of a new administration. The two plays that Blaine "rolled eyes" with was "zone read draws" off the spread.
Please understand that I'm not here to compare credentials or coach anybody up, but I have been heavily involved in organized football for over 40 years and really impressed with what I'm witnessing in such a short time.
My point being we are heading in a good direction with much promise, that's all....
Have a great day....
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)