Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 73

Thread: UL vs Nicholls St. Part II

  1. #25

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    This team's offense is disturbingly BAD.

    This team's base running is disturbingly BAD.

    Pitching is there.

    Time to put it all together.

    The End.


  2. #26

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun View Post
    _ Bottom of 9th

    Lead off hitter gets a single

    2nd batter attempts a sac bunt but we try to get the lead runner and the runner was called safe at 2nd.

    Now 2 on with 0 outs.

    Next Nicholls St. hitter grounds to 1b and we get lead runner at 2nd.

    Nicholls St. wins on sac fly. _
    Wow this team looks pitiful. No other way to put it.

  3. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunStros View Post
    This team's offense is disturbingly BAD.

    This team's base running is disturbingly BAD.

    Pitching is there.

    Time to put it all together.

    The End.
    We're hitting .304 or were coming into the game. Baserunning and clutch hits are what's hurting us. We'll be fine as long as we pitch.


    igeaux.mobi

  4. #28

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    What exactly made everyone so encouraged going into this season? This is not a dig, just asking. There's not much other than the pitching that they seem to do well.


  5. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    Wow this team looks pitiful. No other way to put it.
    LOL, you're a joke


    igeaux.mobi

  6. #30

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    _ We're hitting .304 or were coming into the game. Baserunning and clutch hits are what's hurting us. We'll be fine as long as we pitch.


    igeaux.mobi _

    We've scored a total of 14 runs in 5 games. 2.8 runs per game isn't going to win many games with no Zack Osbourn to speak of.

    .304 doesn't do any good when you aren't clutch. Besides, Greg, Ryan, and T-fred are the only ones really do anything at the plate, thus inflating our team BA.

    Overall, our offense is bad and not clutch outside of Greg.

    Tony will fix this and its still very early, but it just hurts when you struggle/lose against teams like Nichols.

  7. #31

    Default

    I'm just saying we're getting hits just not timely hits. That happens in baseball. We're going to be fine. For someone to call this team pitiful is just stupid. Because it's been 5 games and you are overreacting. Did you think we were pitiful when we started off 14-14 last season? I don't get why the most outspoken people are always the least informed. Try to get a little perspective before you come call a team full of college athletes pitiful.

    igeaux.mobi


  8. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    I'm just saying we're getting hits just not timely hits. That happens in baseball. We're going to be fine. For someone to call this team pitiful is just stupid. Because it's been 5 games and you are overreacting. Did you think we were pitiful when we started off 14-14 last season? I don't get why the most outspoken people are always the least informed. Try to get a little perspective before you come call a team full of college athletes pitiful.

    igeaux.mobi
    I agree we will be fine....but right now...this team is playing pitiful baseball. You can only use the "it's baseball" excuse so much, until it just might be time to say this team isn't good enough. You know and I know this team is a helluva lot better than SEMO and Nichols. But they sure as hell aren't playing like it. You know how we are playing.....pitifully. When you don't execute...your playing pitifully. When your pitchers aren't getting first pitch strikes and getting behind hitters....your pitching pitifully. When a running team can't correctly steal bases....your running the bases pitifully. Sorry you got all hurt over hearing someone say one negative thing about this team...after these first 5 games this team DESERVES to have some negative things said about them. Did I single out any single players and say they aren't good athletes?

    Looks pitiful and calling this team pitiful is two different things. Learn some ______ing semantics you overreacting simpleton. How does that feel? You seem to be pretty outspoken yourself...and highly uninformed.

    To answer your question...when we were 14-14 I thought that team wasn't very good. I was proved wrong....and I ate crow for that. I didn't single out any of these players and say they were pitiful. The way they are playing...sure looks pitiful to me. We know how good this team can be....do you think they are playing to their full potential? Pretty, please, with a cherry on top...next time you decide to call someone out...get the semantics correct so you don't look so foolish.

  9. #33

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Oddly enough, I am at peace thus far. Why? History.

    Patience gentlemen.


  10. #34

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    I agree we will be fine....but right now...this team is playing pitiful baseball. You can only use the "it's baseball" excuse so much, until it just might be time to say this team isn't good enough. You know and I know this team is a helluva lot better than SEMO and Nichols. But they sure as hell aren't playing like it. You know how we are playing.....pitifully. When you don't execute...your playing pitifully. When your pitchers aren't getting first pitch strikes and getting behind hitters....your pitching pitifully. When a running team can't correctly steal bases....your running the bases pitifully. Sorry you got all hurt over hearing someone say one negative thing about this team...after these first 5 games this team DESERVES to have some negative things said about them. Did I single out any single players and say they aren't good athletes?
    Whoa, Albita. Whoa...

  11. #35

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    We haven't pitched poorly outside of 3 guys, we've gotten some hits but not at the right time. We're running the bases poorly and not getting timely hits but they don't look pitiful. Losing 10-0 every game would be looking pitiful. You make yourself look foolish on this board time after time, you hate lsu but you act just like an lsu fan. Also, it's about time you learn the difference between your and you're.


    igeaux.mobi


  12. #36

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    _ We haven't pitched poorly outside of 3 guys, we've gotten some hits but not at the right time. We're running the bases poorly and not getting timely hits but they don't look pitiful. Losing 10-0 every game would be looking pitiful. You make yourself look foolish on this board time after time, you hate lsu but you act just like an lsu fan. Also, it's about time you learn the difference between your and you're.


    igeaux.mobi _
    Hmmmm...seems you have an axe to grind. Poorly and pitifully are actually synonyms. How dare you call these college athletes poor!!! See how dumb that sounds?

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 29th, 2014, 12:06 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 17th, 2013, 06:40 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 15th, 2011, 07:15 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •