Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 73

Thread: UL vs Nicholls St. Part II

  1. #37

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Not playing to their potential =/= looking pitiful. Yeah I get outspoken when fans embarrass themselves and my university with their moronic ramblings.

    igeaux.mobi


  2. #38

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by LFTCajun View Post
    _ Whoa, Albita. Whoa... _
    Were all upset...some people just need to be set straight.

  3. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    Hmmmm...seems you have an axe to grind. Poorly and pitifully are actually synonyms. How dare you call these college athletes poor!!! See how dumb that sounds?
    Saying they run the bases poorly has a different implication than saying OMG THEYZ PLAYIN PITIFUL!



    igeaux.mobi

  4. #40

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    _ Not playing to their potential =/= looking pitiful. Yeah I get outspoken when fans embarrass themselves and my university with their moronic ramblings.

    igeaux.mobi _
    My university too!! You said....POOR. Go look up synonyms for poor. Pitiful is one of them. I strung together a couple of words....hardly seems like rambling. Seems a lot like you are grinding an axe here. You are also doing a bit of rambling....a bit moronic too. Got some personal beef with me? This is the internet chippy. Live with it.

  5. #41

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Hawk... Take a deep breath and step away from the keyboard!
    igeaux.mobi


  6. #42

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Im proud of you for knowing how to use a thesaurus This team looks pitiful has a different implication than we're running the bases poorly. I'll give you a minute to look up the definition of implication.

    igeaux.mobi


  7. #43

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Okay, I'll say it again.

    BEER SUMMIT!!!


  8. #44
    rhineaux's Avatar rhineaux is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    It's weird how there isn't an R in Colonels.


    igeaux.mobi


  9. #45

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by rhineaux View Post
    _ It's weird how there isn't an R in Colonels.


    igeaux.mobi _
    I dunno but there is a linguistics expert here who can argue implication with you on that R thing. Just don't mention the word pitiful.

  10. #46

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Understood Hawk.

    Just keep us up with your bulls-eyed rants. Your last Hud rant left me in tears!! Nyquil influence, notwithstanding...


  11. #47

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by LFTCajun View Post
    _ Understood Hawk.

    Just keep us up with your bulls-eyed rants. Your last Hud rant left me in tears!! Nyquil influence, notwithstanding... _
    Hud rant? I may have to go back and check all my posts to see what I put...

  12. #48

    Default Re: UL v.s. Nichools St. Part II

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    _ Hud rant? I may have to go back and check all my posts to see what I put... _
    Please do so. Was fairy decent.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 29th, 2014, 12:06 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 17th, 2013, 06:40 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 15th, 2011, 07:15 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •