Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 73 to 84 of 91

Thread: Star check

  1. #73

    Default Re: Star check

    Shaun eat me out of house and home and doesnt gain weight.


  2. #74

    Default Re: Star check

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnboy4713 View Post
    _ Shaun eat me out of house and home and doesnt gain weight. _

    So which is it? I've seen where he's listed at 6'4" 190 and the newspaper had him at 6'2" 205?

  3. #75

    Default Re: Star check

    ok but dont tell anyone ok. lol Its 6ft 4 like 185 to be honest

    no way his is over 200 lbs. Larry on the other hand, legit 6ft 4 240 and 4.55 speed


  4. #76

    Default Re: Star check

    Quote Originally Posted by HOUCajun View Post
    _ I believe UL had a top 50 recruiting class in the early Bustle years. It was based primarily on the signing of Jordan Jackson who was a flop WR and Devin Williams who never played a down for the Cajuns at QB.




    igeaux.mobi _
    We also signed like 29 or more players that year which gives us more total points which is the way Rivals does there rankings. This is one reason the SEC is so highly rated each year is because they way over sign kids often signing kids in the upper 20's or 30 something players. The overall stars are added up. Troy does the same thing.

    The year we signed 29 or more was Bustle's 2nd year. His first year he only signed like 11 or so recruits because he came in so late on recruiting and quite frankly no one really wanted to come to UL at the time. The next year since he only signed only 11 he was still allowed to sign JuCo kids in the early signing period. Teams are allowed to sign up to 25 kids a year and it does not all have to come in the spring so some can come in the next fall's early signing period and count back to last spring's signing class. Anyway Bustle signed like multiple JuCo players with some coming in the early signing period, guys like C.C Brown, Atwain Spann, Travis Bass, Darryl Blappert, Travis Cones, Ed Fane, Ken Haynes, Kemmie Lewis, Joseph Scott, and Ricky Thomas. Some of these guys came in the early signing period.

  5. Default Re: Star check

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun View Post
    _ We also signed like 29 or more players that year which gives us more total points which is the way Rivals does there rankings. This is one reason the SEC is so highly rated each year is because they way over sign kids often signing kids in the upper 20's or 30 something players. The overall stars are added up. Troy does the same thing.

    The year we signed 29 or more was Bustle's 2nd year. His first year he only signed like 11 or so recruits because he came in so late on recruiting and quite frankly no one really wanted to come to UL at the time. The next year since he only signed only 11 he was still allowed to sign JuCo kids in the early signing period. Teams are allowed to sign up to 25 kids a year and it does not all have to come in the spring so some can come in the next fall's early signing period and count back to last spring's signing class. Anyway Bustle signed like multiple JuCo players with some coming in the early signing period, guys like C.C Brown, Atwain Spann, Travis Bass, Darryl Blappert, Travis Cones, Ed Fane, Ken Haynes, Kemmie Lewis, Joseph Scott, and Ricky Thomas. Some of these guys came in the early signing period. _
    I remember that when Jason Cherry was signed ------- WE ALL THOUGHT THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A 3 or even 4---but NO ---but yea he was a 3 or 4!!!!

  6. #78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    Yes, and quite a few of the ones that were 2 stars upon signing day were previously rated higher as well.



    igeaux.mobi
    I stand by my statement. I used to follow recruiting pretty closely...way more one's moved to two's than three's to two's.

  7. #79

    Default Re: Star check

    2003 Scout Recruiting Rankings vs Win/Loss % for 2007

    This is the top 50 teams based on win/loss ratio in 2007. The Scout ranking for their recruiting classes 4 years prior in 2003 is in the middle column on left side. As I have said before, star ratings are for top 25 programs with the largest fan base.

    Why is this? Because they keep the goldfish fed, it's a business. Resources for evaluating talent in great detail are applied to the recruits that have early interest from large fanbase teams with lots of subscriptions. Nothing evil about it, it's just good business to do so...

    My proof, has there ever in the history of STAR rating been a 5 star player that did not start his junior season? Yet there are many that had much better senior seasons than the 4 and 5 star guys, that played behind seniors at their HS during their junior year. The vast majority of top 25 teams have 75% of their commitments prior to a single down being played in their senior HS season.

    A kid with high STAR rating means he can play no doubt and that he has the potential, but it also means he started earlier in his HS career because there were not as many talented players ahead of him. Most of the time it also means that he has friends, relatives, or a coach with connections for early recognition. A kid with a lower STAR rating is a shot in the dark because nobody has really spent the time, people, and money to figure out whether he can really play or not.

    Error........Scout.....Win %
    in Rank.....Rank.......Rank........School - ......Win % - .....Wins - ....Losses
    -81........ 82..........1...........Hawaii - ............92% ........12 ............1
    -63........ 65..........2...........Kansas ..............92% .........12 .............1
    1........... .2...........3.......... Louisiana State ...86% .........12 .............2
    -48.........52.........4............Missouri ..............86% ........12 ..............2
    -54........ .59.........5............Brigham Young ....85%.........11...............2
    -5..........11.........6........... Georgia ................85%.........11..............2
    -18........ 25.........7........... Ohio State............85%.........11..............2
    7........... .1.......... 8........... Southern Cal .......85%.........11..............2
    -48........ 57......... 9........... West Virginia........85%.........11...............2
    -17........ 27......... 10......... Boston College.......79%........11...............3
    8............3...........11.........Oklahoma...............79%.........11...............3
    -9..........21......... 12......... Virginia Tech..........79%.........11...............3
    -25........ 38......... 13......... Arizona State........77%.........10................3
    -59........ 73......... 14......... Boise State...........77%.........10................3
    -69........ 84......... 15......... Cincinnati.............77%..........10................3
    2........... 14......... 16......... Texas..................77%..........10................3
    -48........ 65......... 17......... Central Florida.......71%..........10................4
    11..........7.......... 18......... Tennessee.............71%..........10................4
    -90........ 109........19......... Tulsa....................71%..........10................4
    -70........ 90......... 20......... Air Force...............69%..........9.................4
    5...........16..........21......... Auburn...................69%..........9.................4
    -21........ 43......... 22......... Clemson.................69%..........9.................4
    19..........4.......... 23......... Florida....................69%..........9.................4
    -40........ 64......... 24......... Fresno State...........69%..........9.................4
    -6......... 31......... 25......... Illinois.....................69%..........9.................4
    18..........8.......... 26......... Michigan..................69%..........9.................4
    -53........ 80......... 27......... New Mexico.............69%..........9.................4
    -16........ 44......... 28......... Oregon ..................69%...........9................4
    -27........ 56......... 29......... Oregon State...........69%...........9................4
    -20........ 50......... 30......... Penn State..............69%...........9................4
    -51........ 82......... 31......... Connecticut.............69%...........9................4
    -5..........37......... 32......... Texas Tech..............69%...........9................4
    -62........ 95......... 33......... Utah.......................69%...........9................4
    17......... 17......... 34......... Virginia....................69%...........9................4
    -7..........42......... 35......... Wake Forest.............69%...........9................4
    0........... 36......... 36......... Wisconsin................69%...........9................4
    -71........ 108........37......... South Florida............69%...........9................4
    -34........ 72......... 38......... Troy.......................67%...........8................4
    16..........23......... 39......... Arkansas..................62%...........8................5
    -58........ 98......... 40......... Bowling Green...........62%...........8................5
    -40........ 81......... 41......... East Carolina............62%...........8................5
    1........... 41......... 42......... Houston...................62%...........8................5
    -11........ 54......... 43......... Kentucky..................62%...........8................5
    24..........20......... 44......... Mississippi State.........62%...........8................5
    -65........ 110........45......... Navy........................62%...........8................5
    13..........33......... 46......... Purdue......................62%...........8................5
    -22........ 69......... 47......... Rutgers.....................62%...........8................5
    -18........ 66......... 48......... Texas Christian...........62%...........8................5
    -69........ 118........49......... Florida Atlantic............62%...........8................5
    -35........ 85......... 50......... Central Michigan..........57%...........8................6


  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MetryCajun View Post
    igeaux.mobi
    I stand by my statement. I used to follow recruiting pretty closely...way more one's moved to two's than three's to two's.
    Pretty much if a D1 school signs you, you will get a 2nd star. Not always but very often.

    A player can go from zero to two with his own pen.
    igeaux.mobi

  9. #81

    Default Re: Star check

    I thought we had several players the last two years with ZERO stars.

    igeaux.mobi


  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRed View Post
    I thought we had several players the last two years with ZERO stars.

    igeaux.mobi
    Walkons that were never rated.

    igeaux.mobi

  11. #83

    Default Re: Star check

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRed View Post
    _ I thought we had several players the last two years with ZERO stars.

    igeaux.mobi _

    Some Jucos are not rated either and they can be standout players.

  12. #84

    Default Re: Star check

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    _ Pretty much if a D1 school signs you, you will get a 2nd star. Not always but very often.

    A player can go from zero to two with his own pen.
    igeaux.mobi _

    Thank you. You will almost see a two star allocation given to a recruit whether he has been evaluated or not. It's almost a default setting. Going from zero to two stars means nothing.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 22 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 18th, 2015, 09:05 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 10th, 2014, 02:05 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 21st, 2014, 06:40 pm
  4. Baldwin Park star cast long shadow - Pasadena Star-News
    By NewsCopy in forum Preaux Sports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 13th, 2011, 01:15 am
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 30th, 2011, 12:43 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •