Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

  1. #1

    Default Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    NCAA Men's Football - Conference Rankings (2010-2011)


    Rank Conference (Teams) All Non-Conf Index Sos Sos Rk
    1 Big 12 12 89-57 (61%) 40-8 (83%) 47.13 45.71 1
    2 Southeastern 12 90-56 (62%) 41-7 (85%) 47.10 45.14 2
    3 Big Ten 11 78-52 (60%) 35-9 (80%) 45.79 43.65 4
    4 Independents 3 22-14 (61%) 19-11 (63%) 45.57 42.25 7
    5 Pacific-10 10 66-55 (55%) 21-10 (68%) 43.65 43.70 3
    6 Atlantic Coast 12 79-67 (54%) 30-18 (63%) 43.27 43.51 5
    7 Big East 8 52-44 (54%) 24-16 (60%) 42.79 42.26 6
    8 Western Athletic 9 59-54 (52%) 23-18 (56%) 41.42 41.25 9
    9 Mountain West 9 54-56 (49%) 18-20 (47%) 40.47 41.45 8
    10 Conference USA 12 69-78 (47%) 20-29 (41%) 38.06 38.77 10

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11 Mid-American 13 69-91 (43%) 16-38 (30%) 35.73 37.55 11
    12 Sun Belt 9 41-69 (37%) 5-33 (13%) 32.27 34.80 12

    Since 2004, the Sunbelt has been in last place every year. There should be a push to get out and join any other conference. Nothing good can happen staying in the Sunbelt for football.


  2. #2

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    ya think?

    Except we just jumped the WAC. The WAC will probably cease to exist soon.


  3. #3

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Quote Originally Posted by SlappyCajun View Post
    _ ya think?

    Except we just jumped the WAC. The WAC will probably cease to exist soon. _
    I think that we did just jump the WAC and after bowl season and a 3-0 vs the MAC results, we should jump them as well. Are we great, no, are we getting better as a conference, yes.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Ya know, I saw the title of the thread, then I saw who started it and I immediately knew it was negative.


  5. #5

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    WAC does have a bright spot with the addition of these three schools even before any football games are played.

    UT-SA- hired Larry Coker who won a recent national title pretty recently, San Antonio is the largest U.S. city without a Football Bowl Subdivision football program, has over 30,000 students enrolled, they will have the largest media market of any school in the WAC, and the largest stadium in the conference, the Alamodome.

    Texas State-has over 32,000 students enrolled, Austin media area, may hire Dennis Franchione or another big name.

    Montana- The Grizzlies playoff streak of 17 in a row from 1993-2009 is a record at the I-AA level, now known as the NCAA Division I Championship Subdivision. The WAC will only make them more attractive playing in the FBS.


  6. #6

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Quote Originally Posted by BayouTeche View Post
    _ WAC does have a bright spot with the addition of these three schools even before any football games are played.

    UT-SA- hired Larry Coker who won a recent national title pretty recently, San Antonio is the largest U.S. city without a Football Bowl Subdivision football program, has over 30,000 students enrolled, they will have the largest media market of any school in the WAC, and the largest stadium in the conference, the Alamodome.

    Texas State-has over 32,000 students enrolled, Austin media area, may hire Dennis Franchione or another big name.

    Montana- The Grizzlies playoff streak of 17 in a row from 1993-2009 is a record at the I-AA level, now known as the NCAA Division I Championship Subdivision. The WAC will only make them more attractive playing in the FBS. _
    Hasn't Montana refused WAC membership? Hawaii is gone. Does not look very good.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Quote Originally Posted by BayouTeche View Post
    _ WAC does have a bright spot with the addition of these three schools even before any football games are played.

    UT-SA- hired Larry Coker who won a recent national title pretty recently, San Antonio is the largest U.S. city without a Football Bowl Subdivision football program, has over 30,000 students enrolled, they will have the largest media market of any school in the WAC, and the largest stadium in the conference, the Alamodome.

    Texas State-has over 32,000 students enrolled, Austin media area, may hire Dennis Franchione or another big name.

    Montana- The Grizzlies playoff streak of 17 in a row from 1993-2009 is a record at the I-AA level, now known as the NCAA Division I Championship Subdivision. The WAC will only make them more attractive playing in the FBS. _
    If this is a bright spot I would hate to see a negative. BTW, I'm not so sure the Austin area media will be too keyed into what Texas St does.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Montana turned down the WAC.and, yes, the Rainbows are gone.

    igeaux.mobi


  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRed View Post
    Montana turned down the WAC.and, yes, the Rainbows are gone.

    igeaux.mobi
    Quit trying to confuse BT with facts.


    igeaux.mobi

  10. #10

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    FYI, Montana turned down the invite to come in the WAC with the other schools b/c their study would not be finished in time. They may still join the WAC and talks of maybe WAC and Big Sky combining.


  11. #11

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Quote Originally Posted by BayouTeche View Post
    _ FYI, Montana turned down the invite to come in the WAC with the other schools b/c their study would not be finished in time. They may still join the WAC and talks of maybe WAC and Big Sky combining. _
    From what I read, they turned it down, and would not make the move unless Montana State was invited as well. I doubt that Montana is going Wacky any time soon.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Montana said no to WAC. If the WAC has to envelope the Big Skythen Turn out the lights, the party is over.


  13. #13

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Even when presented with facts Teche still stands by his misinformation.gotta love him.


  14. #14

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    No way to rule out Montana from joining the WAC. It won't be for another 2 years anyway. The WAC has an open invite and will throw alot of money their way. WAC wants Montana more than Seattle. Money talks, people walk. Montana will sit back and address facility issues. TV revenue would jump from 72k to 500k. I believe the offer will be too good for them to pass up. If they decide to pass for some reason, the WAC will do whatever it takes to get the prestige it had.


  15. #15

    Default Re: Football Conference Rankings 2010-2011

    Quote Originally Posted by BayouTeche View Post
    _ No way to rule out Montana from joining the WAC. It won't be for another 2 years anyway. The WAC has an open invite and will throw alot of money their way. WAC wants Montana more than Seattle. Money talks, people walk. Montana will sit back and address facility issues. TV revenue would jump from 72k to 500k. I believe the offer will be too good for them to pass up. If they decide to pass for some reason, the WAC will do whatever it takes to get the prestige it had. _
    1. it's at least a 2 year transition period from the time they accept the invite.

    2. the WAC can't throw alot of money their way if they don't have any money to throw. Boise St. didn't make it to a BCS bowl so the money they would have taken in from attending just dipped significantly.

    3. Montana would not only have to address facility issues but budgetary issues with adding the extra money for scholarships, travel to the far reaches of the WAC, etc.

    4. Explain how their TV revenue would jump a full $428k? do you think that any tv deal the WAC had prior to the announcement of Boise St. leaving it will last past that time frame.

    5. The WAC will never have the "prestige" it had with Boise St. once they, fresno St., and Nevada jump to the MWC. it will actually be worse than when the Sunbelt added FCS and start-up teams to keep themselves an actual FBS conference. eventually it will slowly build back up but it will take a good while before it does and will never get to its "former glory" if you can use that term to describe the WAC

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2011 Fantasy Football PPR RB Rankings - Elites TV
    By NewsCopy in forum Sports Mantle
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 8th, 2011, 05:16 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 4th, 2011, 10:50 am
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 30th, 2010, 05:10 pm
  4. College Football 2010 Rankings: No. 103 Louisiana
    By NewsCopy in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: May 25th, 2010, 02:36 pm
  5. CFN 2010 Football Rankings for SBC
    By HoustonCajun in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 13th, 2010, 06:26 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •