Montana said no to WAC. If the WAC has to envelope the Big Sky....then Turn out the lights, the party is over.
Even when presented with facts Teche still stands by his misinformation...gotta love him.
No way to rule out Montana from joining the WAC. It won't be for another 2 years anyway. The WAC has an open invite and will throw alot of money their way. WAC wants Montana more than Seattle. Money talks, people walk. Montana will sit back and address facility issues. TV revenue would jump from 72k to 500k. I believe the offer will be too good for them to pass up. If they decide to pass for some reason, the WAC will do whatever it takes to get the prestige it had.
1. it's at least a 2 year transition period from the time they accept the invite.
2. the WAC can't throw alot of money their way if they don't have any money to throw. Boise St. didn't make it to a BCS bowl so the money they would have taken in from attending just dipped significantly.
3. Montana would not only have to address facility issues but budgetary issues with adding the extra money for scholarships, travel to the far reaches of the WAC, etc.
4. Explain how their TV revenue would jump a full $428k? do you think that any tv deal the WAC had prior to the announcement of Boise St. leaving it will last past that time frame.
5. The WAC will never have the "prestige" it had with Boise St. once they, fresno St., and Nevada jump to the MWC. it will actually be worse than when the Sunbelt added FCS and start-up teams to keep themselves an actual FBS conference. eventually it will slowly build back up but it will take a good while before it does and will never get to its "former glory" if you can use that term to describe the WAC
ULM won a D1aa NC before making the jump to D1A. WKU the same. Neither has ahd a winning season in D1A yet. Performance at one level does not necessarily translate to success at the next. I wouldn't be so quick to bestow accolades on the WAC based on the theoretical performance of D1aa schools looking to move up.
BT, your use of logic and understanding of basic facts reminds me very much of Nancy Pelosi. If this is what you aspire to, then congrats.......you have succeeded. Your new nickname henceforth is Nancy. In honor of your real life aspiration to debate on par with your hero's abilities.
Nancy, have a nice day.
PP II
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)