Good on A&M!
http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mai...g%2B%253E%253E
http://www.tigerdroppings.com
go back home
Good on A&M!
http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mai...g%2B%253E%253E
http://www.tigerdroppings.com
go back home
I am still puzzled to how some of you have such high "reputations" on this forum as your logic is so horribly erratic and falsified that it hurts to read.
You know there are 3rd graders that are on a 5th grade level and vice versa right? so that comparison in your argument totally contradicts itself. Maybe you should take your own advice and hit yourself to "try knocking some sense into yourself" because this is clearly something you lack. But I do enjoy reading how you try to outwit anyone talking good about McNeese. Not so much that you make them feel dumb, but more so the fact that you make yourself look even dumber.
"Your comparison to Jerry Rice falls to the ground with an earth shattering thud"
I like this one. He couldn't even explain why Jerry Rice sux b/c he played in the SWAC which that conference is worst overall than the Southland. Never any facts to support an arguement. I guess he thinks Wayne Chrebet and Kurt Warner are terrible too b/c of where they played college. He has zero knowledge about players.
Yea if you don't understand logic, then move on. If you are so smart, find a post where I say, "anyone who has gone to UL, or have thought about UL, are losers." You maybe one of the reasons why the program is where it is. With that line of thinking, you will never move forward and see the light. Why don't you have any suggestions to help the program? Reading your posts shows me that you don't have any thoughts of vision. You just like some on here, if the kid don't sign with the Cajuns then he must suck. Whatever "Swagging," too proud to say your school name.
I never said they were not good players. Once again you fail. These players were good in the NFL. But, you cannot compare players on different levels of competition. I never once said they suck. I made fun of McNeese but I never said they suck. This is you putting words in my mouth to make yourself look more foolish than you already have. Would you compare a professional baseball player playing at A ball, to a professional baseball player playing at AA ball? You cannot compare two players playing at different levels of competition. This is elementary. On the NFL level, all the players you listed can be compared to other players in the NFL. But since they did not play Division 1A football, comparing their college careers to players who played in Division 1A is comparing apples to oranges. So, since you seem to be a mental midget, here is what I am saying and what I said in my last post....you cannot compare a player in Division 1A to a player who played in Division 1AA. Different levels of competition.
Teche, I give in buddy... you are sooooo smart! If you know as much as you think you know, you wouldn't be trolling on raginpagin.
You are correct, you have never said, "anyone who has gone to UL, or have thought about UL, are losers." However, that is what you are implying.
UL has had problems, I will agree... that has nothing to do with me. I will support UL until the day I die. If you want to ____ on UL, that's fine, but don't think we will not fight for UL!
Seriously, get a life man.
Yes you can compare D1aa to D1a, especially when the d1aa player proves it against d1a players. That d1aa guy had d1aa guys blocking for him and catching his passes. That d1aa guy does not have the luxury of d1a guys receiving his passes. So they then go to a combine, that d1aa guy went into the draft as a QB, and that d1a guy went in as a DB. So whats ur point?
Please don't talk baseball, if you knew how the minors leagues worked, A ball has way more players and propects than AA ball. The high draft picks go to short season rookie then straight to A, then move up quickly to pro level or AAA for a bit. Guys who get called up don't spend time in AA hardly.
Farroux was a great player. Maybe UL missed on one. However, recruiting misses happen on every level of football. What is the point? LSU would have rathered Tyrell Fenroy to Ally Broussard. What is your point with Farroux?
igeaux.mobi
[QUOTE=SlappyCajun;275033]
_ Farroux was a great player. Maybe UL missed on one. However, recruiting misses happen on every level of football. What is the point? LSU would have rathered Tyrell Fenroy to Ally Broussard. What is your point with Farroux?
Point being Fourroux was overlooked and cost the Cajuns a chance at his little brother. Left a bad taste in their mouth. Cajuns may have a chance on Micah Eugene, looks like he is being told he can play RB at Bama though. I knew Saban would be on him so HUD needs to work his magic.
Wow I hate to jump back in the middle of this, but what the hell. My only point to those arguing against Fourroux is not him vs. Desormeaux. It would be Fourroux vs. Hundley. Hundley did not fit our offensive scheme at all yet he was offered way before Fourroux. Hundley, as expected to anyone who knew his skill set, never set foot on the field and eventually transferred. I'll say this: I would have loved to have Fourroux on that sideline in 2008 when we were down to a severely injured Desormeaux, a banged up McGuire, and an unproven freshman in Masson.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)