Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Paul Johnson explains his offense...

  1. #21

    Default Re: Paul Johnson explains his offense...

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    _ Sewak's last season was 2005.

    Monken is coaching in 2010.

    The number of players still on scholarship recruited to run the option can probably be counted on 1 hand.

    Yes, there is a transition, just like there is every time you change staffs!!!!!

    Quit chasing bogeymen.


    Hey CajunT, just be glad your guy has a fighting chance. Because, if Monken was available, this search would have been over last week. _
    Quit drinking the special of the day! First, it was this guy never was given the chance at Ole Miss (Orgeron) and now this guy was screwed at Georgia Southern (Sewak). Next thing you will be telling everyone is Monken turned down UL because he is a candidate at Miami or Florida.LOL!!!

    For the record, I like Monken.

  2. #22

    Default Re: Paul Johnson explains his offense...

    Quote Originally Posted by SlappyCajun View Post
    Why is that?
    nm

  3. #23

    Default Re: Paul Johnson explains his offense...

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    _ Georgia Southern

    2005 -- (8-4) Sewak option offense

    2006 -- (3-8) VanGorder

    2007 -- (7-4) Hatcher passing offense


    Hawaii

    1995 -- (4-8) Bob Wagner running Johnson's offense. Johnson was the OC there until 1993.

    '96-'98 -- (5-31) Fred vonAppen, a bad Bill Wash wannabe fails miserably

    1999 -- (9-4) June Jones wins the WAC


    I think this points to the fact that this is more about coaching than style of offense. Besides, don't most new hires get at least 3 years (9 in some cases) to turn things around? _

    So by saying its more about coaching rather than the offense, why such the defense of the triple option itself? If he's that good of a coach, couldn't he come in and run an offense based on the personnel available? This seems to contradict previous posts that you've made. In my mind, the flexbone option which is what this is by the way, is somewhat similar to the veer. However, I tend to believe that both are somewhat obsolete and if a defense figures the scheme out, the offense it not as equipped to make adjustments and become more balanced. I think the spread offers more chances for the smaller programs to compete with the larger schools and create matchups that they can exploit. It ALL centers around coaching and scheme but I just feel that the flexbone is not what we need.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. UL OC Johnson pleased with offense so far
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 24th, 2015, 01:26 am
  2. After LA: coach Paul Johnson (UL 1997-2004)
    By NewsCopy in forum LA Vie Bio
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 17th, 2012, 01:36 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •