Mike Sewak

[CajunZ1]

Has anybody taken the handle "ConditionalCajun"?

Maybe Bicky Rustle could take that one...

+1
I was thinking the same thing. It is like when IHateLaState didn't want to be known as a hater.

igeaux.mobi

[MetryCajun]

_ Is the elephant in the room that people don't like that he's a dumpy looking guy?

Just a thought.


igeaux.mobi _

You are so shallow.

[CajunZ1]

Immediate face cut.

You are so shallow.

igeaux.mobi

[RedCajun]

_ I just don't want to run a flexbone triple option attack...Pretty simple for me. I also don't want to pay the guy 400k to do it. _

Exactly

[MetryCajun]

_ Immediate face cut.


igeaux.mobi _

Would Les Miles be a hat cut?

[CRAWFISH61]

What the hell is wrong with the option? It works for Air Force, Navy, and Army. Notice a trend. They don't exactly have the greatest talent pool to recruit from. They have smart, tough, well conditioned athletes probably not the prototypical BCS athlete. But when we try to run the normal BCS offenses we don't get the the prototypical BCS athlete. People on this forum complain all the time about short passing game, bubble screens, etc. I guarantee one thing no matter what offense the new coach runs someone will complain about it. Give me an offense that no one else in the conference is running whether it is running or passing. I am sick and tired of looking at the spread and the pistol. I want to see a huddle. I don't understand why fire Bustle and run the same scheme. I want something that the other teams have to prepare for once a year. Most of all give me a defense. Everyone is worried about offense. Let us pray for a defense that can be first in conference.

[cajunlamprey]

Also, my comments were based on what Slappy mentioned earlier. If we are going to make our next head coach one of the highest paid coaches in the league, thus doubling what we were paying Bustle then I would want a coach with more experience or a better track record than what this particular candidate would bring. If not, then we need to structure the pay accordingly. And yes, a part of me does want that sizzle factor to play a part of the hire. I would love that hire that would send a message to our other conference mates that we will be a player in the conference for years to come and someone who can recruit regionally and possibly even nationally. _

I'm in total agreement with the quoted paragraph above.

We have been complaining about Bustle and pointing out that for his salary what else could we expect. If we're going to spend the money, then let's make it worthwhile. Otherwise, let's spend the extra cash on items like an additional strength and conditioning coach.

There are only two coaches that have been mentioned in this entire process that I believe moves us into a different category and provides the sizzle. Sadly, according to JP's blog we haven't spoken with one of them.

[Hammer58]

_ What the hell is wrong with the option? It works for Air Force, Navy, and Army. Notice a trend. They don't exactly have the greatest talent pool to recruit from. They have smart, tough, well conditioned athletes probably not the prototypical BCS athlete. But when we try to run the normal BCS offenses we don't get the the prototypical BCS athlete. People on this forum complain all the time about short passing game, bubble screens, etc. I guarantee one thing no matter what offense the new coach runs someone will complain about it. Give me an offense that no one else in the conference is running whether it is running or passing. I am sick and tired of looking at the spread and the pistol. I want to see a huddle. I don't understand why fire Bustle and run the same scheme. I want something that the other teams have to prepare for once a year. Most of all give me a defense. Everyone is worried about offense. Let us pray for a defense that can be first in conference. _

The complaint was not that we attempted to run bubble screens but that we could not execute them worth a damn.

[TuffGuy84]

_ Is the elephant in the room that people don't like that he's a dumpy looking guy?

Just a thought.


igeaux.mobi _

Don't count me as one of those. I don't care if our next coach has all the attractiveness of a pirate leper with a peg leg and a club foot, as long as we win, I'll be happy. I'm just not sold on Sewak, I just think Hudspeth is a better choice.

[GetTheFacts1st]

_ Don't count me as one of those. I don't care if our next coach has all the attractiveness of a pirate leper with a peg leg and a club foot, as long as we win, I'll be happy. I'm just not sold on Sewak, I just think Hudspeth is a better choice. _

He may be staying at MS State after Meyer resigned today. In a different capacity.

[CajunFreak]

_ What the hell is wrong with the option? It works for Air Force, Navy, and Army. Notice a trend. They don't exactly have the greatest talent pool to recruit from. They have smart, tough, well conditioned athletes probably not the prototypical BCS athlete. But when we try to run the normal BCS offenses we don't get the the prototypical BCS athlete. People on this forum complain all the time about short passing game, bubble screens, etc. I guarantee one thing no matter what offense the new coach runs someone will complain about it. Give me an offense that no one else in the conference is running whether it is running or passing. I am sick and tired of looking at the spread and the pistol. I want to see a huddle. I don't understand why fire Bustle and run the same scheme. I want something that the other teams have to prepare for once a year. Most of all give me a defense. Everyone is worried about offense. Let us pray for a defense that can be first in conference. _

Post of the Year!

[TuffGuy84]

_ He may be staying at MS State after Meyer resigned today. In a different capacity. _

I figure, but in my opinion, I'd have him behind Deforest and Pelini, and I'm not sold on the Deforest hire either. Hudspeth was the guy I really wanted, but its looking like hes out, hopefully a miracle occurs and he's the guy here.