View Poll Results: How would you rate rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

Voters
144. This poll is closed
  • 10

    9 6.25%
  • 9

    2 1.39%
  • 8

    4 2.78%
  • 7

    1 0.69%
  • 6

    2 1.39%
  • 5

    12 8.33%
  • 4

    6 4.17%
  • 3

    15 10.42%
  • 2

    16 11.11%
  • 1

    77 53.47%
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 76

Thread: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

  1. #31

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeebart21 View Post
    _ nm _
    If this isn't the #1 hot button subject we've had, it ranks among the top.

    I wish everybody had the experience I had being a forum host because every time it came up I got caught in the crossfire "off the record, on the QT, and very hush-hush" (to borrow a phrase from the movie L.A. Confidential).

    This person has been blown up as a poster child for the difficulties we have been having. In a collage of things I have heard are the following:
    1. Off the record, she doesn't like the city tag and wants the same identity that we feel was ours and subsequently ripped off
    2. She is caught in the crossfire in the politics surrounding the situation
    3. She tried to force Rickey Bustle to accept the hot wheels logo on the team's helmets by giving him the choice between that and what they have now, when he wanted something else.
    4. She was overworked and understaffed, and subsequently athletics marketing was dumped on her plate.
    5. I've heard that she has a lot of power
    6. I've heard that her influence is overestimated
    7. I've also heard that anyone in her position would be in an impossible situation.
    8. I could have been knocked over with a feather when she was introduced at the recruiting bash and didn't get booed off the stage (which says that the message board isn't the real world.
    9. Let's quit talking about this thing until the SAVOIE DOCTRINE is disclosed.


    I can't explain all of this, except that the leadership for the past 30+ years has created an atmosphere of tension and uncertainty. It's important to note that we have new people in charge. It's also important to know that the new people inherited some major baggage and they have to address it (the next time Wright Waters refers to us as U-L-L I will EXPLODE!).

    The obvious solution is for athletics to provide its own marketing. This subject will never get anywhere until athletics is allowed/encouraged to determine its own destiny.

    I am not objective. I'm pro-UL. It's time to get to the root of the REAL problems and if we do so, I think we'll do all right and all of these penny-ante pitch battles we've gotten caught up with will become insignificant.

    I wish this subject would go away. If it did, and the real things that can make a difference can take hold, we won't worry so much about our temporary situation.

    But I will say that our leaders had better strut their stuff PDQ.

  2. #32

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by California Cajun View Post
    _ If this isn't the #1 hot button subject we've had, it ranks among the top.

    I wish everybody had the experience I had being a forum host because every time it came up I got caught in the crossfire "off the record, on the QT, and very hush-hush" (to borrow a phrase from the movie L.A. Confidential).

    This person has been blown up as a poster child for the difficulties we have been having. In a collage of things I have heard are the following:
    1. Off the record, she doesn't like the city tag and wants the same identity that we feel was ours and subsequently ripped off
    2. She is caught in the crossfire in the politics surrounding the situation
    3. She tried to force Rickey Bustle to accept the hot wheels logo on the team's helmets by giving him the choice between that and what they have now, when he wanted something else.
    4. She was overworked and understaffed, and subsequently athletics marketing was dumped on her plate.
    5. I've heard that she has a lot of power
    6. I've heard that her influence is overestimated
    7. I've also heard that anyone in her position would be in an impossible situation.
    8. I could have been knocked over with a feather when she was introduced at the recruiting bash and didn't get booed off the stage (which says that the message board isn't the real world.
    9. Let's quit talking about this thing until the SAVOIE DOCTRINE is disclosed.


    I can't explain all of this, except that the leadership for the past 30+ years has created an atmosphere of tension and uncertainty. It's important to note that we have new people in charge. It's also important to know that the new people inherited some major baggage and they have to address it (the next time Wright Waters refers to us as U-L-L I will EXPLODE!).

    The obvious solution is for athletics to provide its own marketing. This subject will never get anywhere until athletics is allowed/encouraged to determine its own destiny.

    I am not objective. I'm pro-UL. It's time to get to the root of the REAL problems and if we do so, I think we'll do all right and all of these penny-ante pitch battles we've gotten caught up with will become insignificant.

    I wish this subject would go away. If it did, and the real things that can make a difference can take hold, we won't worry so much about our temporary situation.

    But I will say that our leaders had better strut their stuff PDQ. _
    Ok Thanks! I guess!

  3. #33

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeebart21 View Post
    _ with all the Louisiana @ Lafayette ~~~~ floating around, how can anyone give her better than a 5?

    We`are our own worst enemy......

    She is a classic example of UL knowing its place....

    Thankfully we took the bull by the horns, did an end around an produced UL gear on our own.

    Z. _

    Julie Dronet did what Dr. A told her to do. She will do what Dr. S tells her to do. I don't blame her, I blame the head of UL. Dr. S needs to have ba**s and move this name issue in athletics.

    What will be interesting is when we play LSU next week. Check the UL media press releases for our games. We use LOUISIANA exclusively and even ask to be called LOUISIANA athletically and NOT to be referred to as UL L. Look at the one for the Tennessee game on the UL athletic website. I can't wait to see what we put out for the LSU game.

    Then, we wear uniforms that say LOUISIANA Lafayette. I am so frustrated with this inconsitent approach.

  4. #34
    Zeebart21's Avatar Zeebart21 is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonCajun View Post
    _ Julie Dronet did what Dr. A told her to do. She will do what Dr. S tells her to do. I don't blame her, I blame the head of UL. Dr. S needs to have ba**s and move this name issue in athletics.

    What will be interesting is when we play LSU next week. Check the UL media press releases for our games. We use LOUISIANA exclusively and even ask to be called LOUISIANA athletically and NOT to be referred to as UL L. Look at the one for the Tennessee game on the UL athletic website. I can't wait to see what we put out for the LSU game.

    Then, we wear uniforms that say LOUISIANA Lafayette. I am so frustrated with this inconsitent approach. _
    My post was made over 4 years ago. I have NO interest in this matter or Mrs Dronet at this time.

    Z

  5. #35

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonCajun View Post
    _ Julie Dronet did what Dr. A told her to do. She will do what Dr. S tells her to do. I don't blame her, I blame the head of UL. Dr. S needs to have ba**s and move this name issue in athletics.

    What will be interesting is when we play LSU next week. Check the UL media press releases for our games. We use LOUISIANA exclusively and even ask to be called LOUISIANA athletically and NOT to be referred to as UL L. Look at the one for the Tennessee game on the UL athletic website. I can't wait to see what we put out for the LSU game.

    Then, we wear uniforms that say LOUISIANA Lafayette. I am so frustrated with this inconsitent approach. _
    Mrs. Dronet was given the boundaries in which to operate from Dr. Authement. How she operated inside those boundaries was entirely her decision and her actions alienated more then a few people in athletics and academics. To say that she was responsible for the policy would not be accurate; but to say she was not responsible for the manner in which the policy was implemented would not be correct as well.

    Mrs. Dronet’s current supervisor has made it clear that her role is in support of policy and not in the implementation of it. Enough said:

  6. #36

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Blaming the city tag for anything is foolish. Florida Atlantic seems to be doing just fine with their odd "ocean" tag in their name. Texas, Tenn, UNC, even LSU have city tags. The difference is those schools have seperated themselves athletically from the other schools in their system. Perhaps we should focus on that.

    igeaux.mobi


  7. #37

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginCajun08 View Post
    _ Ok Thanks! I guess! _
    My long-winded remarks weren't intended to be a criticism of you or anybody on this board. It has been a frustrating subject for me because nothing ever comes of it.

    One way I do "my part" as hopefully a catalyst for change is refuse to buy any UL gear unless the Lafayette is textured (the stitching is the same color as the background) or so inconspicuous you'd have to be alert to notice it. I feel that under the current restrictions they have tried to meet me half way if they texture.

    We had a little discussion about a year ago on Cracker Barrel Restaurant's lack of UL apparel. It had been one of my favorite eating places but in about a month's trying the buyer would not return my phone call and I haven't been there since. The reason I wanted to talk to him was to find out if dealing with UL was a help or a hinderance in getting our stuff on the shelves. The manager and one of the wait staff was cheering me on when I expressed an interest in improving things in this area and had no problem giving me their names!

  8. #38

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    nm


  9. #39

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    User_Name, you're 'partially correct' -- We want the name. You got a problem with that? That's your real agenda, isn't it? It is to deny the name that was on my diploma in 1984.

    Oh, sure, sure. You'll probably come back with some post about how you don't care what we're called. I'm sick of the 'not caring' about the name from those whose real agenda is to deny my school its rightful name.


  10. #40

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by California Cajun View Post
    _ If this isn't the #1 hot button subject we've had, it ranks among the top.

    I wish everybody had the experience I had being a forum host because every time it came up I got caught in the crossfire "off the record, on the QT, and very hush-hush" (to borrow a phrase from the movie L.A. Confidential).

    This person has been blown up as a poster child for the difficulties we have been having. In a collage of things I have heard are the following:
    1. Off the record, she doesn't like the city tag and wants the same identity that we feel was ours and subsequently ripped off
    2. She is caught in the crossfire in the politics surrounding the situation
    3. She tried to force Rickey Bustle to accept the hot wheels logo on the team's helmets by giving him the choice between that and what they have now, when he wanted something else.
    4. She was overworked and understaffed, and subsequently athletics marketing was dumped on her plate.
    5. I've heard that she has a lot of power
    6. I've heard that her influence is overestimated
    7. I've also heard that anyone in her position would be in an impossible situation.
    8. I could have been knocked over with a feather when she was introduced at the recruiting bash and didn't get booed off the stage (which says that the message board isn't the real world.
    9. Let's quit talking about this thing until the SAVOIE DOCTRINE is disclosed.


    I can't explain all of this, except that the leadership for the past 30+ years has created an atmosphere of tension and uncertainty. It's important to note that we have new people in charge. It's also important to know that the new people inherited some major baggage and they have to address it (the next time Wright Waters refers to us as U-L-L I will EXPLODE!).

    The obvious solution is for athletics to provide its own marketing. This subject will never get anywhere until athletics is allowed/encouraged to determine its own destiny.

    I am not objective. I'm pro-UL. It's time to get to the root of the REAL problems and if we do so, I think we'll do all right and all of these penny-ante pitch battles we've gotten caught up with will become insignificant.

    I wish this subject would go away. If it did, and the real things that can make a difference can take hold, we won't worry so much about our temporary situation.

    But I will say that our leaders had better strut their stuff PDQ. _
    After the president and the AD, the most important positions on campus are news services, and marketing. Here's why I say that, because if you don't do those two things well, it doesn't much matter how well you do the rest. Nobody will notice.

    News services and marketing at UL are not strong. We don't hear about the good things, and our marketing performance seems to be just a lot of harrassment and missed opportunities.

    We can argue whether JSD is the person who stuck us with @Lafayette. Does anyone really feel that we see UL enough in the news, that are merchandise is available enough in town or nationally or that our coaches and fans can have the logos and products they want?

  11. #41

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by Louisiana84 View Post
    _ I'm sick of the 'not caring' about the name from those whose real agenda is to deny my school its rightful name. _
    I don't speak for user name, but for me, I am a Louisiana Alumni and Supporter, and I would love to be known as Louisiana and refer to us as such, but I respectfully disagree that it is our "rightful name" until we earn it. We clearly have not earned it in athletics. JMO

    I think that UL-Lafayette is better than ULL. The lafayette tag is easier to slowly get away from than the "L". ULM markets that. It's like Alabama and UAB. I hope the new administration improves our academics and athletic programs so that we are recognized as THE University of Louisiana. The day will come!

  12. #42

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by FTBLFN View Post
    _ I don't speak for user name, but for me, I am a Louisiana Alumni and Supporter, and I would love to be known as Louisiana and refer to us as such, but I respectfully disagree that it is our "rightful name" until we earn it. We clearly have not earned it in athletics. JMO

    I think that UL-Lafayette is better than UL. The lafayette tag is easier to slowly get away from than the "L". ULM markets that. It's like Alabama and UAB. I hope the new administration improves our academics and athletic programs so that we are recognized as THE University of Louisiana. The day will come! _
    It was earned when the State Board of Trustees of Colleges and Universities granted the name in 1984.

  13. #43

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Louisiana84,

    You are missing the point. I am not discussing the name, but rather the thought that the name is holding UL back in athletics. To blame any shortcomings in athletics on the city tag is dumb. As I stated earlier, FAU has done just fine with the ocean tag in their name.


  14. #44

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Also, is the university required to use the city tag in athletics? I thought it was only on official correspondence, etc... What legally prevents the athletic department from marketing itself using the UL or Louisiana tags? It seems this is done already, just not consistently.

    Just win. That will take care of peripheral issues like the one being discussed here.


  15. #45

    Default Re: 2004: Rate Julie Simon-Dronet's job performance

    Quote Originally Posted by User_Name View Post
    _ Louisiana84,

    You are missing the point. This isn't a discussion about the name, but rather one about the name holding UL back. To blame any shortcomings in athletics on the city tag is dumb. As I stated earlier, FAU has done just fine with the ocean tag in their name. _
    While I agree with you that the name change has nothing to do with the failure of athletics, you might want to do your homework on the Sun Belt. FAU is among a hand full of schools to ask the Sun Belt office to refer to them by a particular name. They have asked not to be called "Florida Atlantic", but FAU in all sport references. So names are a important part of a marketing strategy for sport programs, and not just the Cajuns in the Sun Belt.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Time to rate my own performance
    By NewsCopy in forum Sports Mantle
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 23rd, 2010, 07:10 am
  2. Julie Simon-Dronet joins Cox
    By NewsCopy in forum Biz Acadiana
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: January 19th, 2010, 02:25 pm
  3. Rate Gerald Hebert's job performance
    By Turbine in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: May 21st, 2004, 08:18 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •