I gave you a link of the local teacher's organization or association that is affiliated with the NEA (National Educators Association); their actions are similar in protecting their jobs. Last time I checked, the NEA is union. The day they took sick days or personal days to attend a political rally in Baton Rouge, that is a job action in my book sir. Not all teachers were replaced, and classes or school days were cut short. Nowhere are employees allowed to take a day off to attend political rallies on the tax payer's dime.
Also, let me address your concern about the lack of oversight over private schools. Which private schools are you questioning? If you are talking about financial oversight because they are accepting vouchers then I agree with your assessment. In fact, I don't believe any private or charter school that does not have a record of graduating students or decent ACT scores should be allowed to receive state vouchers.
When you say that the private schools don't have the accountability as the public system, no one is debating that fact. My question to you is just how much state or federal accountability did my son's school need when 35% of his class scored 27 or higher on the ACT and graduated 97% of their students? And that record was accomplished with teachers making less money, receiving fewer benefits and working similar hours. I also say the same thing to those that bring up standardize testing, when the public education system can produce those results for $6,000 a year per student, then there will be no need for accountability.