The ban on post season play would be for all sports, not just football and basketball. Baseball and softball could not compete in regionals. That would not be fair to those athletes. Now having said that, I will agree that we don't really know if players would have transferred had a change been made. Usually, few do after the new coach meets with them. However, I was not in the interview room and those who were concluded that it was too big a risk to take.
Dude you are really looking like an ASS right now. Parrot has not asked D. Walker the questions, because D. Walker is hiding somewhere and refusing to be interviewed, questioned, etc. Don't attack Parrot because the UL AD is to chicken ____ to stand up for his decision.
GEAUX UL!
I'm no expert on Cajun basketball, the Cajun administration, the APR, or reporting the news and with all due respect to all of the players in this issue, but expecting fact finding in the form of personal discussions with the guy making the decision before supporting his decision does not appear to be "nitpicking". imo
Hopefully, Coach Lee and his team will respond to the opportunity presented to them and you guys will be dancing next year.
Best of luck.
I just find that with Josh being on this board and answering all of the questions posed, some would have a little patience with regards to getting answers. Its a known fact that Walker hasn't spoken since the press release. It just seems like there has been a barrage of repetition to some extent on the subject. Just me, but Parrott has been pretty forthcoming on the issues
Not that I'm taking up for DW (I signed the petition), but have you ever heard of an AD calling a press conference to announce they are keeping a coach who was already under contract? Nope. So maybe the correct choice was made as Josh suggests. The fact that it came to that choice is where the more serious problem lies.
igeaux.mobi
No offense Josh, but there is no way you could make up story lines that would be more 'entertaining' (frustrating/disappointing) than the clown factory that is UL athletics.
The term 'mind boggling' comes into focus while trying to determine how UL still has any fan support considering the administering of the athletic department over its history.
Well, its not like everyone is satisfied with this call: message board, sports talk shows, etc. This is where a good bit of fans come to talk sports, others listen to 1420, others read the paper and some do all. There is a gross majority of people that would like to hear from the AD.
Do you think that the people expressing opinions here are in the minority with wanting answers? It seems like the people who pay for the tickets, merch, etc are for the most part left wanting more.
Again, the main point I was making was that this is not just keeping coaches. This is keeping them at a point where they are both failing on the court badly. Its not just a regular offseason decision.
Sorry, there are more then a few examples of Athletic Directors holding press conferences on the subjects of retaining coaches, assistant coaches, terminating coaches and coaches agreeing to new contracts.
side note: None of those programs are currently on NCAA probation or have received written warning from the NCAA for low APR scores. For this reason, Friday's released statement was unacceptable in explaining the decision to retain both coaches considering the magnitude and consequences.
It doesn't matter if Mr. Walker is unwilling or is uncomfortable in conducting such press conferences. His decision not to do so was unprofessional and is poor judgement on his part.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)