Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53

Thread: The Book: 2002 Baseball

  1. Default Regional Host Predictions ...

    The following are my Regional Host and National Seed predictions as of 5/15. Note that these are not the selections that I believe should be made. These are my predictions of what the NCAA will do.

    National Seeds
    1. Clemson
    2. Wake Forest
    3. Alabama
    4. Rice
    5. South Carolina
    6. Stanford
    7. Texas
    8. Florida State

    Commentary:
    Wake Forest could easily grab the #1 national seed by winning the ACC. Wake Forest finishes at Duke while Clemson hosts Florida State. Both are even in the loss column with five. Florida State must play well against Clemson to maintain a national seed. Else, they could lose it to Houston.

    Texas becomes a national seed by virtue of winning the tough Big XII. The Horns have also swept Rice this year.

    Regional Host Sites:
    Clemson (#1 seed)
    Wake Forest (#1 seed)
    Alabama (#1 seed)
    Rice (#1 seed)
    South Carolina (#1 seed)
    Stanford (#1 seed)
    Florida State (#1 seed)
    Texas (#1 seed)
    Nebraska (#1 seed)
    LSU (#1 seed)
    Southern California (#2 seed)
    Florida (#1 seed)
    Ohio State (#2 seed)
    Rutgers (#2 seed)
    Boston College (#2 seed)
    North Carolina (#1 seed)

    Commentary:
    The region of Louisiana/Texas/Mississippi houses a number of potential regional sites. But the new geographical restrictions will likely force one or more regionals in this area to migrate elseware. I look for this region to obtain roughly twelve bids to the NCAA tournament. The state of Oklahoma will add three more schools. Houston could be the school most affected by the new travel restrictions that the NCAA would like to implement. However, if Houston can gain national seed status, the NCAA could grant the city of Houston two regionals.

    I have roughly six schools making the NCAA tournament in the northeast. The NCAA will need at least one site in the northeast. If Boston College (whom plays Notre Dame this weekend) can win the Big East regular season title, I see a regional being played at Fenway Park. Mark it down, the Big East will have a host school. Whether that school is Boston College, Notre Dame, or Rutgers, will depend on this coming weekend. In fact, the northeast really needs two sites. With respect to geography, Rutgers makes the most sense and is my pick for the second northeastern regional.

    The north will also need at least one regional. I think the best bet right now is the winner of the Big 10 (Minnesota or Ohio State). The Golden Gophers and Buckeyes meet this weekend and are separated by only half of a game. Nebraska or Wichita State will also host.

    The winner of the Georgia Tech/North Carolina series could decide the last regional site host. The middle east coast will need three or four regionals as I have at minimum fourteen schools making the tournament in this part of the country. The NCAA might decide to award a regional to a school like Richmond, instead of a fourth ACC school, as the Virginia/Maryland corridor will likely have three representatives in the tournament.

    Brian


  2. UL Baseball Baseball stats throough 05-14-2002

    Stats through 05-14-2002

    #PlayerAVGGP-GSABRH2B3BHRRBITBSLG%
    0000000000000
    24COLES, Corey.0.36752-491993873103641107.538
    20SNEED, Bryan.0.29852-50181285410084188.486
    2CARBONI, Scott.0.29629-197120216021033.465
    4LAMBIN, Chase.0.29353-5119142561601244108.565
    23WILSON, Jason.0.28945-38149294311001554.362
    17SALOOM, Brad.0.28245-3412420353232551.411
    30MORRIS, Dallas.0.27532-20691719301625.362
    12BOURQUE, Justin.0.25949-4215828415241962.392
    5REDMOND, Charles.0.25644-22781520120325.321
    27HAWKE, Phillip.0.25547-3610620275021338.358
    40SHELTON, Robert.0.24139-288711214121733.379
    28KABEL, Mike.0.20635-28979202121630.309
    29ELLIS, Lloyd.0.18629-16591011210515.254
    19PREAU, Kevin.0.16729-95499110212.222
    8VICKNAIR, Doug.0.22425-185812132151032.552
    25MORGAN, Justin.0.17135-8351600006.171
    1VERRET, Chad.0.17144-54197400511.268
    22REED, Scott.0.1679-1121210013.25
    6RAMOS, Alberto.0.11816-3171200002.118
    32DEES, Ray.0.09115-1114100001.091
    31ARDOIN, Kevin.01-0000000000
    15GABRIEL, Justin.01-0010000000
    0000000000000
    0Totals.0.26853-5317973254818614472737360.41
    0Opponents.0.25153-531822238458959372086820.374

  3. NCAA ...continued

    Stats continued

    PlayerBBHBPSOGDPOB%SFSHSB-ATTPOAEFLD%
    COLES, Corey.1122840.4022718-2170630.962
    SNEED, Bryan.8122810.365213748066010.985
    CARBONI, Scott.1631710.44103747921770.731
    LAMBIN, Chase.2214300.362453738673126180.917
    WILSON, Jason.823220.3273119-2276101
    SALOOM, Brad.2072810.44137576253220.966
    MORRIS, Dallas.1051410.41537351164450.923
    BOURQUE, Justin.2082510.3691014-1766117130.934
    REDMOND, Charles.1332300.3830015-1921020.913
    HAWKE, Phillip.3242900.44111372923351480.978
    SHELTON, Robert.1862020.3982137320145960.924
    KABEL, Mike.332230.25200372572002260.974
    ELLIS, Lloyd.1311800.34200373201421101
    PREAU, Kevin.722100.286013735018010.947
    VICKNAIR, Doug.532110.31801372591141320.984
    MORGAN, Justin.11900.216030-31261001
    VERRET, Chad.401800.244013735223201
    REED, Scott.00410.167000-06110.875
    RAMOS, Alberto.001200.11800372583001
    DEES, Ray.00500.09100373181610.875
    ARDOIN, Kevin.00000000-01710.889
    GABRIEL, Justin.00000000-073020.949
    Totals.21163417180.3612128124-1701420588830.96
    Opponents.19537439260.334142956-821395527970.952

  4. Default

    Originally posted by Turbine
    Wow very imressive work.

    Who do you think has the edge between Wichita and Nebraska?
    With respect to strength of the squads, as determined by the NCAA, they are evenly matched. The NCAA might give Wichita State a slight edge due to the single game victory over Nebraska in Lincoln.

    As far as a regional is concerned, Nebraska has an edge because they are further north. Having a regional in Lincoln will be more conducive to hosting schools such as Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Minnesota (provided they do not host themselves), ... etc.

    Brian

    Evidently, not one northeast school submitted a bid to host an NCAA baseball regional this year (deadline is today, initial paperwork deadline was May 3rd). In addition, Richmond did not bid. Hence, neither Boston College nor Rutgers will be hosting.

    A recent article quoting the NCAA's Jim Wright was rather interesting. ?It is not going to have anything to do with if you?re a top seed or how good your bid is,? Wright said. ?It?s all going to be about geography. That means there?s no guarantee that a top-seeded team would host.?

    What is going to happen now with respect to regional sites? Who knows?

    Brian

  5. Default Gonegolfin's 2002 NCAA Baseball Tournament Projections ...

    2002 NCAA Baseball Tournament Projections
    The following are my predictions for the entire field of 64 as of 5/22. Note that these are not the selections that I believe should be made. They are my predictions of what the NCAA will do. These projections will be updated at the conclusion of the conference tournaments (Sunday) to account for any upset bid winners.

    Process:
    1) Select the tournament field of 64 teams
    2) Select the sixteen #1 seeds and from that list declare eight national seeds
    3) Select the regional host sites with primary emphasis on the geographic representation of the tournament field. Secondary considerations include the criteria used in past years.
    4) Allocate tournament field to regional sites based on geography. Schools from the same conference cannot meet in first round games.
    5) Seed teams within regional.
    6) Pair regional sites for super-regional matchups. These super-regional matchups will take into account:
    a) Strength of the #1 seeds representing the respective regionals
    b) Geography of the regionals
    c) National seed regionals must be paired with non-national seed regionals
    d) #1 seeds from the same conference cannot be paired against each other in a potential super-regional matchup (I am assuming this rule still applies ? so until further notice)

    2002 NCAA Tournament Field:
    The field consists of 30 conference automatic qualifiers and 34 at-large selections. Regular season champions, and in the case of the Pac 10 ? regular season leaders, are assumed to win their respective conference automatic bid.

    Boyd Nation?s pRPI is listed in [].

    America East Conference: (1)
    Maine (projected automatic bid) [81]

    Atlantic Coast Conference: (5)
    Florida State (projected automatic bid) [2], Wake Forest [3], North Carolina [12], Clemson [1], Georgia Tech [5]

    Atlantic Sun Conference: (3)
    Central Florida (projected automatic bid) [44], Florida Atlantic [48], Stetson [25]

    Atlantic-10 Conference: (1)
    Richmond (projected automatic bid) [15]

    Big East Conference: (3)
    Notre Dame (projected automatic bid) [49], Virginia Tech [67], Boston College [68]

    Big South Conference: (2)
    Coastal Carolina (projected automatic bid) [32], Elon [39]

    Big Ten Conference: (2)
    Minnesota (projected automatic bid) [82], Ohio State [106]

    Big 12 Conference: (6)
    Texas (projected automatic bid) [10], Nebraska [17], Texas Tech [22], Oklahoma [29], Oklahoma State [42], Baylor [24]

    Big West Conference: (3)
    California-State Northridge (projected automatic bid) [37], California State-Fullerton [23], Long Beach State [30]

    Colonial Athletic Association: (3)
    James Madison (projected automatic bid) [21], North Carolina-Wilmington [41], Delaware [45]

    Conference USA: (4)
    Houston (projected automatic bid) [6], Louisville [33], Texas Christian [43], Southern Mississippi [54]

    Horizon League: (1)
    Illinois-Chicago (projected automatic bid) [134]

    Ivy Group: (1)
    Harvard (automatic bid already secured) [191]

    Metro Atlantic Athletic Conference: (1)
    Marist (projected automatic bid) [65]

    Mid-American Conference: (1)
    Bowling Green State (projected automatic bid) [146]

    Mid-Continent Conference: (1)
    Oral Roberts (automatic bid) [145]

    Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference: (1)
    Bethune-Cookman (automatic bid already secured) [66]

    Missouri Valley Conference: (3)
    Wichita State (projected automatic bid) [20], Creighton [50], Southwest Missouri State [46]

    Mountain West Conference: (1)
    San Diego State (projected automatic bid) [84]

    Northeast Conference: (1)
    Central Connecticut State (automatic bid already secured) [197]

    Ohio Valley Conference: (1)
    Southeast Missouri State (projected automatic bid) [92]

    Pacific-10 Conference: (3)
    Southern California (projected automatic bid) [31], Washington [83], Stanford [11], Arizona State [34]

    Patriot League: (1)
    Navy (automatic bid already secured) [173]

    Southeastern Conference: (6)
    South Carolina (projected automatic bid) [4], Alabama [13], Florida [9], LSU [8], Auburn [23], Georgia [16]

    Southern Conference: (1)
    The Citadel (projected automatic bid) [98]

    Southland Conference: (1)
    Northwestern State (projected automatic bid) [63]

    Southwestern Athletic Conference: (1)
    Southern (automatic bid already secured) [75]

    Sun Belt Conference: (2)
    South Alabama (automatic bid) [18], Louisiana [14]
    Western Athletic Conference: (2)
    Rice (automatic bid already secured) [7], San Jose State [55]

    West Coast Conference: (1)
    Pepperdine (projected automatic bid) [161]

    Independents: (1)
    Miami [19]

    Bubble Teams:
    Arkansas [36], East Carolina [38], Florida International [26], George Washington [72], Indiana [103], Michigan State [79], Mississippi [27], Mississippi State [47], Oregon State [77], Rutgers [53], South Florida [40], Texas A&M [52], Tulane [56], Western Kentucky [62]

    Commentary:
    Conference play is extremely important to the NCAA committee. No team with a losing record in conference play has made the NCAA tournament since the inception of the new format in 1999. Hence, winning in conference and conference finish is paramount. I performed a little data mining exercise on the 2000 and 2001 NCAA tournaments (1999 data not available at press time). With respect to at-large bids, not once in these two tournaments did the NCAA award an at-large bid to a school placing behind a fellow conference school not receiving a bid to the tournament.

    Florida International finished the season above .500 in Sun Belt conference play by sweeping Middle Tennessee State on the final weekend. However, the Golden Panthers still finished fourth in the conference, two games in the loss column behind Western Kentucky. Western Kentucky also swept Florida International this year. The NCAA likely will not issue Florida International an at-large bid without Western Kentucky in the tournament. A Western Kentucky ? Florida International SBC Tournament final will likely earn Florida International a spot in the NCAA tournament. This is because a) either Western Kentucky wins the SBC tournament (gaining an automatic bid) and the NCAA does not need to skip over Western Kentucky in the standings to get to Florida International or b) Florida International wins the tournament and the automatic bid. The bottom line is that Golden Panther fans should be pulling for Western Kentucky to either win the SBC tournament or lose in the finals to Florida International. Upsets in conference tournament championships will hurt these bubble teams. That is, teams that normally would not make the NCAA tournament field winning automatic bids and gaining that conference an additional bid it would not have had the upset not occurred. Schools such as Western Kentucky, Florida International, Delaware, Southern Mississippi, Boston College, and Southwest Missouri State will be affected most if these upsets occur.

    Texas A&M and Mississippi (pRPI of 27) likely played themselves out of at-large bids this weekend. Mississippi failed to make the SEC conference tournament and finished under .500 in SEC play. Mississippi has lost their last six SEC games and is 3-7 over their last ten games. Mississippi is done for the season. Texas A&M finished one game under .500 in Big XII play. Unless the Aggies perform well in the Big XII tournament, their season is likely over.

    East Carolina (pRPI of 38) lost 2/3 this weekend to finish sixth in Conference USA. I do not see the NCAA leapfrogging Tulane to admit East Carolina to the NCAA tournament field. Not unless East Carolina makes the finals of the Conference USA tournament. The NCAA is not going to take seven Conference USA teams.

    National Seeds:
    1. Florida State
    2. South Carolina
    3. Texas
    4. Rice
    5. Wake Forest
    6. Clemson
    7. Houston
    8. Stanford

    NCAA Regional Tournament #1 Seeds:
    Florida State, South Carolina, Texas, Rice, Wake Forest, Clemson, Houston, Stanford, Georgia Tech, LSU, Alabama, North Carolina, Florida, Wichita State, South Alabama, Nebraska

    Commentary:
    Florida State made an impressive run to close the season and win the Atlantic Coast Conference. The Seminoles are deserving of a #1 national seed, but they will need to prove themselves in Omaha. The College World Series has not been kind to Florida State.

    Texas is moving up and ran away with the Big XII title in impressive fashion. A season sweep of Rice earns the Longhorns the #3 seed. Houston creeps into the national seed picture with its impressive out of conference schedule, strong pRPI, and Conference USA championship. An SEC tournament championship could vault surging LSU into the national seed picture.

    The NCAA will undoubtedly, once again, emphasize conference regular season champions and conference tournament champions when determining #1 seeds.

    NCAA Regional Hosts:
    Clemson
    Wake Forest
    Alabama
    Rice
    South Carolina
    Stanford
    Texas
    Florida State
    LSU
    Florida
    Wichita State
    Nebraska
    Ohio State
    Notre Dame
    California State-Fullerton
    Southern California

    Commentary:
    The Louisiana/Texas region houses a number of potential regional sites. But the new geographical restrictions will likely force one or more regionals in this area to migrate elsewhere. Houston could be the school most affected by the new travel restrictions that the NCAA would like to implement. The state of California really needs a third regional, which could cost the Cougars a chance to host the second regional in the city of Houston.

    The north, especially the northeast, is hurting for regional sites. Boston College and Rutgers failed to submit bids. This means that there are a number of northern schools that must travel. Richmond might have also been a possibility, but the Spiders do not have the facilities to host and did not want to host in the local minor league ballpark. Hence, a bid was not submitted. Notre Dame is a very likely host site as is Ohio State. Minnesota is another candidate.
    NCAA Regional Projections:

    Tallahassee, Florida
    1. Florida State (N1)
    2. Central Florida
    3. Miami
    4. Bethune Cookman

    versus

    Gainesville, Florida
    1. Florida
    2. Georgia
    3. Stetson
    4. Florida Atlantic

    Columbia, South Carolina
    1. South Carolina (N2)
    2. Coastal Carolina
    3. Virginia Tech
    4. Citadel

    versus

    Lincoln, Nebraska
    1. Nebraska
    2. Creighton
    3. Minnesota
    4. Illinois-Chicago

    Austin, Texas
    1. Texas (N3)
    2. Texas Tech
    3. Texas Christian
    4. Oral Roberts

    versus

    Fullerton, California
    1. South Alabama
    2. California State-Fullerton
    3. Arizona State
    4. Washington

    Houston, Texas
    1. Rice (N4)
    2. Louisiana
    3. Oklahoma State
    4. Maine

    versus

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    1. LSU
    2. Baylor
    3. Northwestern State
    4. Southern

    Winston Salem, North Carolina
    1. Wake Forest (N5)
    2. James Madison
    3. Elon
    4. Delaware

    versus

    Wichita, Kansas
    1. Wichita State
    2. Oklahoma
    3. Southwest Missouri State
    4. Southeast Missouri State

    Clemson, South Carolina
    1. Clemson (N6)
    2. Richmond
    3. North Carolina-Wilmington
    4. Navy

    versus

    Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    1. Alabama
    2. Auburn
    3. Southern Mississippi
    4. Central Connecticut State

    Columbus, Ohio
    1. North Carolina
    2. Louisville
    3. Ohio State
    4. Bowling Green State

    versus

    South Bend, Indiana
    1. Houston (N7)
    2. Notre Dame
    3. Marist
    4. Harvard

    Palo Alto, California
    1. Stanford (N8)
    2. California State-Northridge
    3. San Jose State
    4. Pepperdine

    versus

    Los Angeles, California
    1. Georgia Tech
    2. Southern California
    3. Long Beach State
    4. San Diego State

    Commentary:
    Note that the #1 seeds not hosting will likely be traveling to remote areas. The NCAA will sacrifice one team traveling in order to keep two or more teams close to home. Also note that the Big XII has six schools in the tournament. Yet, there are only two Texas regionals. Therefore, it will be difficult to have an all Louisiana regional in Baton Rouge. Since no more than two Big XII schools can be assigned to any one region, there is a decent chance that a Big XII school will be assigned to Baton Rouge with the University of Louisiana traveling to the state of Texas. This allows four or five Big XII teams to stay in the Texas/Louisiana corridor while keeping Baton Rouge a mostly Louisiana regional. It also helps balance the regionals while keeping schools close to home. Should the University of Houston be awarded a regional, this would change. But this would cause problems in other part of the country, as regional sites are needed elsewhere.

    Brian


  6. UL Baseball Sunbelt redemption time

    An extremely ironic twist will occur on Thursday. Louisiana's Justin Gabriel will face Sunbelt "Baseball Pitcher of the Year" and WKU pitcher Ryan Bicondoa.

    After suffering a couple of Friday losses going up against the likes of Ryan Bicondoa, Justin was moved to Saturday rotation.

    What comes to mind is the coaching staff not wanting Justin to have to go toe to toe with the Bicondoa's of the Sunbelt?

    Well after just his second weekend of getting first nod Andy Gros gets rocked in the second inning against USA, and the Cajuns end up losing 10-3. This is an ironic twist in itself, as 3 runs was the only margin needed for all the other victors in the Sunbelt on Wednesday.

    So on Thursday it is Justin Gabriel up against Ryan Bicondoa. I just thought we were trying to avoid this scenario? Perhaps this time there will be a different result.


  7. Default

    Justing Gabriel retires the first nine batters he faces.


  8. Default

    A masterful pitching duel through nine innings. 1-1

    Louisiana 4-1 on the year in extra inning games.


  9. Default

    Bottom of the 10th after Robichaux had Gabriel intentionally walk a WKU player, Justin loses control and gives up a bases loaded walk.

    Waiting for the NCAA


  10. #25

    Default Shame

    Shame that Justin couldn't have had Bicandoa's scalp at least once.


  11. Default Schools bidding on ...

    an NCAA Baseball Regional ...

    I have updated my list to include Miami (Fla.), California-Irvine, and Auburn. Indiana has been removed from the list.

    I have confirmation from the NCAA that the following schools have submitted bids for an NCAA Baseball regional ...

    Alabama, Arizona State, Auburn, Baylor, California State-Fullerton, California-State Irvine, Clemson, East Carolina, Florida, Florida State, Fresno State, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Houston, Long Beach State, Louisiana, LSU, Miami (Fla.), Minnesota, Mississippi, Mississippi State, Nebraska, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma State, Rice, San Diego State, South Alabama, South Carolina, Southern Cal, Stanford, Stetson, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Wake Forest, and Wichita State.

    Brian


  12. People Sunbelt gets four Hurray!

    Louisiana
    USA
    NMSU
    FIU


  13. UL Baseball 2002 Baseball NCAA Tournament Field

    Tallahassee, Fla.
    1. Florida State*
    2. Central Florida (reg season opponent 3-0)
    3. South Florida (reg season opponent 1-0)
    4. Stetson

    South Bend, Ind.
    1. South Alabama (Sunbelt 1-2)
    2. Notre Dame*
    3. Ohio State
    4. Kent State


    Los Angeles
    1. South California*
    2. Cal State Northridge
    3. Maine
    4. Brigham Young

    Stanford, Calif.
    1. Stanford*
    2. Long Beach State
    3. San Jose State
    4. Cal State Fullerton


    Austin, Texas
    1. Texas* (reg season opponent 1-0)
    2. Baylor
    3. Lamar (reg season opponent 0-2)
    4. Central Connecticut State

    Tempe, Ariz.
    1. Houston (reg season opponent 0-3)
    2. Arizona State*
    3. San Diego
    4. New Mexico State (Sunbelt 3-0)

    Baton Rouge, La.
    1. LSU* (reg season opponent 2-0)
    2. Louisiana
    3. Tulane (reg season opponent 2-0)
    4. Southern (reg season opponent 1-1)

    Houston
    1. Rice* (reg season opponent 0-1)
    2. Texas Tech (reg season opponent 1-0)
    3. Washington
    4. Harvard

    Clemson, S.C.
    1. Clemson*
    2. East Carolina
    3. Elon (Rock Hill S.C.)
    4. Georgia Southern

    Wichita, Kansas
    1. Wichita State* (reg season opponent 1-2)
    2. Oklahoma
    3. Arkansas
    4. Oral Roberts

    Lincoln, Nebraska (brand new field)
    1. Nebraska*
    2. Southwest Missouri State
    3. Marist
    4. Wisconsin-Milwaukee

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina
    1. Wake Forest*
    2. Richmond
    3. Navy
    4. George Washington

    Columbia, S.C.
    1. South Carolina*
    2. North Carolina
    3. James Madison
    4. Virginia Commonwealth

    Gainesville, Fla.
    1. Florida*
    2. Florida International (Sunbelt 2-1)
    3. Miami
    4. Bethune-Cookman

    Atlanta
    1. Georgia Tech*
    2. Georgia
    3. Louisville
    4. Coastal Carolina

    Tuscaloosa, Ala.
    1. Alabama*
    2. Auburn
    3. Florida Atlantic
    4. Southeast Missouri State

    *#1 seed AND home field

    edited by turbine


  14. Default NCAA Tournament Selection surprises ...

    Surprise #1
    FIU surprised me. Not that they are not worthy of being in the tournament. They are. But the NCAA leapfrogged a Western Kentucky team that swept them and finished two games in the loss column ahead of FIU in the conference standings. This combination is a new precedent. I wonder if the NCAA used the new rules and restrictions (geography) to break some of their unwritten rules of the past.

    Surprise #2
    Conference championships were not valued as they were in the past. Northwestern State (pRPI 60), San Diego State (pRPI 86), and Minnesota (pRPI 83) did not make the field. All three schools also made their conference tournament finals before losing. Instead, Arkansas (sub .500 SEC) (pRPI 35), Elon (2nd in Big South and 1-2 in conference tournament) (pRPI 46), Tulane (5th in CUSA, 2-2 in tournament) (pRPI 54), and South Florida (7th in CUSA, 2-2 in conference tournament) (pRPI 38) made the field of 64. Tulane (pRPI 54) also leapfrogged Southern Mississippi (4th) (pRPI 55) and TCU (3rd) (pRPI 45) in the CUSA standings to make the field. San Diego State did not make the field; meanwhile ESPN broadcasts a segment on their selection show featuring head coach Tony Gwynn and the San Diego State program. Talk about having your bubble burst!

    Surprise #3
    Arkansas making the field over Mississippi State. Mississipi State finished 7th in the SEC and Arkansas 8th. Mississippi State won 2/3 from Arkansas during the season. Mississippi State won 6 of its last 10 and Arkansas split its last 10 games. Both were 1-2 in the SEC tournament. The difference had to be the pRPI, 35 to 50 in Arkansas' favor. BTW, Mississippi State took 3/4 from Georgia, while Arkansas lost 2/3 to Georgia. Mississippi State was 5-2 against these opponents, Arkansas was 2-4, and Georgia 3-4. Georgia and Arkansas made the field. Mississippi State did not.

    Surprise #4
    Stanford receiving a national seed over Houston. I have to wonder if this was done for geographical purposes. If so, it violates their stated procedure. Houston won their conference title and has a pRPI of 8. Stanford finished second in the Pac Ten to Southern California. Stanford has a pRPI of 12. It seems the NCAA wanted a western super-regional. This could not have happened without Stanford being a national seed ... which brings us to surprise #5 ...

    Surprise #5
    The NCAA committee paired two #1 seeds from the same conference in a potential super-regional matchup (Stanford and Southern California). They could have paired Mesa, Arizona (Houston, likely the #9 seed) against Palo Alto (Stanford #8 national seed). But they elected to minimize travel in the super-regionals as well by pairing Texas - Houston and Stanford - Southern California for potential super-regional matchups.

    Surprise #6
    The NCAA selection committee really botched the Palo Alto regional. Stanford, a #8 national seed, must play California State-Fullerton (#4 seed) in the first round. You say that it is because of geography. Well, why do we have Maine (#3 seed) and BYU (#4 seed) in Los Angeles for the Southern California regional? BYU is closer to Palo Alto and would make sense as a #4 seed going up against Stanford in the first round. Especially considering that a national seed should merit an easier first round game and regional. Fullerton is just outside of Los Angeles, thus it makes complete sense to have California State-Fullerton in Los Angeles. But this is where the NCAA screwed themselves. They could not have California State-Fullerton in Los Angeles as the #4 seed. They could not justify having Maine seeded above them. But the Titans could not be the #3 seed as they would have a first round matchup with California State-Northridge (same conference). Hence, they stacked the national #8 seed regional in Palo Alto while Southern California gets a break. The NCAA did not need to send Maine to the West Coast ... which brings us to the next surprise.

    Surprise #7
    The NCAA did not take my recommended list of regional sites. :-) They took 15 of the 16, but neglected to select Ohio State (instead selecting Georgia Tech). This would have averted the log jam out west and put Maine much closer to home (albeit a plane trip as well). But if I am being cautious of potential terrorist threats, I would much rather fly into Columbus, Ohio than Los Angeles, California.

    Surprise #8
    I nailed all of the #1 seeds!

    Surprise #9
    I botched six teams!

    Surprise #10
    Navy (pRPI 173) was slotted as a #3 seed in the Wake Forest regional. Meanwhile, George Washington (pRPI 59) is the #4 seed. They did this not because Navy is deserving of a higher seed. They obviously are not. They did this because they could not find another regional slot for George Washington. They could not be the #3 seed in the Wake Forest regional because they would have to face Richmond (#2 seed) in the first round (same conference). Very sloppy work by the NCAA.

    Surprise #11
    The thing that troubles me the most about the selections this year seems to be even more reliance on the RPI. The NCAA took the Top 37 teams in the pRPI this year, save Mississippi. Mississippi would have made it as well had it not been for the fact that they finished 9th in the SEC and failed to qualify for the NCAA tournament. The RPI is a heavily flawed measurement of strength, yet the NCAA seems to becoming increasignly dependent on it as a measuring stick.

    Brian


  15. UL Baseball

    Very nice, your ability to show the surprises shows your strengths.

    "The RPI is a heavily flawed measurement of strength"

    What exactly flaws it?


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Book 2002-03 UL Lady Cajuns Volleyball
    By NewsCopy in forum Volleyball
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: May 29th, 2003, 06:17 pm
  2. The Book: 2002-03 Tennis (M/W)
    By Louisiana in forum Tennis
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: April 24th, 2003, 05:31 am
  3. The Book Lady Cajuns basketball 2002-03
    By Louisiana in forum Basketball
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: March 6th, 2003, 06:55 am
  4. Lady Cajuns Soccer 2002
    By Louisiana in forum Soccer
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: February 19th, 2003, 11:07 am
  5. The Book: 2002 Softball (post-season)
    By Louisiana in forum Softball
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: July 21st, 2002, 05:57 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •