Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5
Results 49 to 52 of 52

Thread: Playmakers on Offense

  1. #49

    Ragin' Cajuns Re: Playmakers on Offense

    Quote Originally Posted by foofoochaisson View Post
    _ I've been told virtually the same thing.. and if this is the case. its a big problem _
    It is the case and it is a big problem; one that the staff will lose their jobs over if they continue to allow it. I firmly believe that the staff's insistence on keeping Masson as the starter cost us at least 2 games last year, perhaps more; and I also believe that our injury problem at RB was due in large part to Masson hanging them out to dry on 'bad' reads.

  2. #50

    Default Re: Playmakers on Offense

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunZ1 View Post
    _ We cannot win more than 6 games without a consistent passing game. That has been proven many times throughout Bustle's tenure. The coaches know this, so they have to pick who they believe is the best passer/decision maker.

    We as fans are perhaps the least qualified in having an educated opinion about who's better, especially when the talent differences are so minor. Remember last spring? Who was going to be quarterback?? The answer was, "there is no real answer." _

    Actually, going into last spring, the firm answer was that the job belonged to McGuire, even when he had his surgery. Masson kept playing really well and Brad was struggling both before and after his surgery. The answer wasn't finally made until mid fall when Masson was more consistent running the offense.

  3. #51

    Default Re: Playmakers on Offense

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    It is the case and it is a big problem; one that the staff will lose their jobs over if they continue to allow it. I firmly believe that the staff's insistence on keeping Masson as the starter cost us at least 2 games last year, perhaps more; and I also believe that our injury problem at RB was due in large part to Masson hanging them out to dry on 'bad' reads.
    That would explain a lot of unexplainable things I saw on the field last year, and would uphold my view that our best chanvce for success in 2010 is with Brad at QB.


    We run the zone-option-spread, and we have a :

    Questionable RB situation,

    Questionable OL situation.

    Puting a QB in there that has little running skills and little respect from the rest of the team is begging to get skull drug.


    If we ran a pro-set, I would want Masson in there all night. We don't.

  4. #52

    UL Football Re: Playmakers on Offense

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    _ That would explain a lot of unexplainable things I saw on the field last year, and would uphold my view that our best chanvce for success in 2010 is with Brad at QB.


    We run the zone-option-spread, and we have a :

    Questionable RB situation,

    Questionable OL situation.

    Puting a QB in there that has little running skills and little respect from the rest of the team is begging to get skull drug. _
    To quote a former Saints headcoach-Jim Mora
    You just don't know- you might think you know but you just don't know.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 19th, 2014, 10:30 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 5th, 2012, 05:50 am
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 18th, 2012, 01:56 am
  4. UL's playmakers: Defense steps up the action
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 12th, 2011, 01:04 pm
  5. NFL's Best Defensive Playmakers _ ESPN 14.20
    By NewsCopy in forum Sports Mantle
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 13th, 2011, 05:10 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •