Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: RPI 5/19/2010

  1. UL Baseball RPI 5/19/2010

    The Cajuns' RPI dropped .0040 due to the loss at McNeese State last night. While the result was a drop of only two spots in the ordinal rankings, the loss did bring the Cajuns much closer to some of the teams immediately below them. The Cajuns are a mere .0021 away from the #41 spot. It is possible that a single loss this weekend will not keep the Cajuns in the RPI Top 45. More on that later ...

    Northwestern State continues to remain outside of the Base RPI Top 75, dropping a spot to #79 after last night's win over ULM. Their RPI actually dropped .0004 after last night (but there are other factors than simply the game vs. ULM).

    26 0.5873 College of Charleston 26 0.5849
    27 0.5866 Louisiana State 24 0.5866
    28 0.5844 North Carolina 27 0.5844
    29 0.5828 Rice 31 0.5786
    30 0.5825 Virginia Tech 29 0.5825
    31 0.5792 Texas A&M 30 0.5792
    32 0.5763 Washington State 33 0.5709
    33 0.5739 Oregon State 32 0.5739
    34 0.5707 Florida Atlantic 35 0.5695
    35 0.5706 California 36 0.5670
    36 0.5699 Louisiana 34 0.5699
    37 0.5695 Western Kentucky 44 0.5629
    38 0.5685 New Mexico 47 0.5613
    39 0.5685 Kansas State 38 0.5655
    40 0.5682 Southeastern Louisiana 41 0.5640
    41 0.5678 Tennessee 43 0.5636
    42 0.5659 Stanford 37 0.5659
    43 0.5645 The Citadel 40 0.5645
    44 0.5638 Liberty 39 0.5650
    45 0.5637 Baylor 42 0.5637
    46 0.5627 Pittsburgh 45 0.5627
    47 0.5618 Texas Tech 46 0.5618
    48 0.5618 Boston College 48 0.5588
    49 0.5617 Florida Gulf Coast 52 0.5551
    50 0.5612 Elon 54 0.5534

    Brian


  2. #2

    Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    That's why every win is important, and why I get soo upset with the way Tony handles the midweek out of conference games.

    Do you think if we take 2 of 3 from ULM this weekend that we are in a regional regardless of what we do in the conference tournament?


  3. #3

    Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    How did he mismanage or mishandled last nights game? What would u have done differently
    igeaux.mobi


  4. #4

    Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunProud View Post
    _ That's why every win is important, and why I get soo upset with the way Tony handles the midweek out of conference games.

    Do you think if we take 2 of 3 from ULM this weekend that we are in a regional regardless of what we do in the conference tournament? _
    Yea, but you're not looking at the big picture. If Tony needs to give a couple of guys rest after playing 3 this weekend and soon to be playing an earlier series (Thu through Sat) in order to avoid any possible injury, etc in the coming weekend and conference tournament, then that's what he has to do. His pitching choices are how they should be. You need all kinds of arms if you want to win the conference tournament, which is one of the goals along with winning the regular season. You cant just have some of these guys coming in a SBC tournament game without pitching for 3 weeks.

    Every game matters, but you have to balance the consequences of your decisions. Cook is usually our Sunday guy, but Tony wants to move him to the 4th spot in midweek. Well you know what, Cook gave up runs last night. Its not like he started a random guy.

    Bottom line is, if we take care of business in the important games, then Tony's decisions were sound. Get upset all you want, but hopefully we can agree that Robe undoubtedly knows what goes on with the RPI and knows far more than any of us about his players and their needs.

    I'm pretty sure Brian has said before that he believed .500 ball would be good the rest of the way.

  5. #5

    Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by wcd35 View Post
    _ Yea, but you're not looking at the big picture. If Tony needs to give a couple of guys rest after playing 3 this weekend and soon to be playing an earlier series (Thu through Sat) in order to avoid any possible injury, etc in the coming weekend and conference tournament, then that's what he has to do. His pitching choices are how they should be. You need all kinds of arms if you want to win the conference tournament, which is one of the goals along with winning the regular season. You cant just have some of these guys coming in a SBC tournament game without pitching for 3 weeks.

    Every game matters, but you have to balance the consequences of your decisions. Cook is usually our Sunday guy, but Tony wants to move him to the 4th spot in midweek. Well you know what, Cook gave up runs last night. Its not like he started a random guy.

    Bottom line is, if we take care of business in the important games, then Tony's decisions were sound. Get upset all you want, but hopefully we can agree that Robe undoubtedly knows what goes on with the RPI and knows far more than any of us about his players and their needs.

    I'm pretty sure Brian has said before that he believed .500 ball would be good the rest of the way. _
    ditto

  6. #6

    Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    Bottom line is mike is a veteran and didn't have a good outing. It's not like he started someone that is still developing, or is a project. All the other guys threw well. And offensively we had 2 guys got a start that held there own. So I'm confused how robe mishandled this mid week game

    igeaux.mobi


  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wcd35 View Post
    Yea, but you're not looking at the big picture. If Tony needs to give a couple of guys rest after playing 3 this weekend and soon to be playing an earlier series (Thu through Sat) in order to avoid any possible injury, etc in the coming weekend and conference tournament, then that's what he has to do. His pitching choices are how they should be. You need all kinds of arms if you want to win the conference tournament, which is one of the goals along with winning the regular season. You cant just have some of these guys coming in a SBC tournament game without pitching for 3 weeks.

    Every game matters, but you have to balance the consequences of your decisions. Cook is usually our Sunday guy, but Tony wants to move him to the 4th spot in midweek. Well you know what, Cook gave up runs last night. Its not like he started a random guy.

    Bottom line is, if we take care of business in the important games, then Tony's decisions were sound. Get upset all you want, but hopefully we can agree that Robe undoubtedly knows what goes on with the RPI and knows far more than any of us about his players and their needs.

    I'm pretty sure Brian has said before that he believed .500 ball would be good the rest of the way.
    Excellent post!

    igeaux.mobi

  8. Default Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by lifetimecajun View Post
    _ Bottom line is mike is a veteran and didn't have a good outing. It's not like he started someone that is still developing, or is a project. All the other guys threw well. And offensively we had 2 guys got a start that held there own. So I'm confused how robe mishandled this mid week game

    igeaux.mobi _
    I agree. Cook has got to be a stopper in that situation. He's pitched pretty well, lately, but I'm disappointed in his effort last night.. I don't really trust the guy in critical times.

  9. #9

    This is so COOL Re: RPI 5/19/2010

    Quote Originally Posted by wcd35 View Post
    Yea, but you're not looking at the big picture. If Tony needs to give a couple of guys rest after playing 3 this weekend and soon to be playing an earlier series (Thu through Sat) in order to avoid any possible injury, etc in the coming weekend and conference tournament, then that's what he has to do. His pitching choices are how they should be. You need all kinds of arms if you want to win the conference tournament, which is one of the goals along with winning the regular season. You cant just have some of these guys coming in a SBC tournament game without pitching for 3 weeks.

    Every game matters, but you have to balance the consequences of your decisions. Cook is usually our Sunday guy, but Tony wants to move him to the 4th spot in midweek. Well you know what, Cook gave up runs last night. Its not like he started a random guy.

    Bottom line is, if we take care of business in the important games, then Tony's decisions were sound. Get upset all you want, but hopefully we can agree that Robe undoubtedly knows what goes on with the RPI and knows far more than any of us about his players and their needs.
    Exactly. In another thread were complaining about a lack of depth and then complain about not playing starters during the mid-week. At some point these guys have to get on the field and play the game.

    But hey this game was on a Tuesday wasn't it ? Tuesday games don't count.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. RPI 5/21/2010
    By GoneGolfin in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 21st, 2010, 09:51 am
  2. RPI 5/12/2010
    By GoneGolfin in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 12th, 2010, 01:52 pm
  3. RPI 5/10/2010
    By GoneGolfin in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May 11th, 2010, 10:28 am
  4. RPI 5/9/2010
    By GoneGolfin in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 9th, 2010, 04:13 pm
  5. RPI 5/8/2010
    By GoneGolfin in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 8th, 2010, 03:36 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •