No more animal testing

[60swerethebest]

This is EPA testing in their lab for toxic chemicals. Long term, finding alternatives to critter testing makes sense. Will take a while to find complete alternatives for pharmaceuticals, however. That’s our niche.
I know some on this board are well known researchers. I know some on this board are clueless about research. But if we aren’t competitive enough to remain R1 generally, just shut it down and go back to competing with McNeese and SLU. Because a lot of our amazing faculty will head out the door.

[ChanceEncounter]

I've seen a whole flurry of compassionate caring animal videos on Facebook and You tube the shorts. I've never heard of that in my life.

[ChanceEncounter]

To be specific where one animal saves the life of another animal. Who is filming this or is it AI

[KajunKrazy]

This will stop future cures of several diseases.

[ZoomZoom]

This is EPA testing in their lab for toxic chemicals.

UL will be fine.

[AboveAverage]

I've seen a whole flurry of compassionate caring animal videos on Facebook and You tube the shorts. I've never heard of that in my life.

I've seen them too, those are all fake AI vidoes but they sure look real. They are designed to create fake compassion buttons for our supposed equals.

[ZoomZoom]

Y'all missed the annual SPCA Christmas ads with the pathetic looking pups while begging for money?

[NOCajun]

Because we can't afford it. Does nothing for us.

Oh, so we sacrifice research grants to save money?

[cajunfan96]

Oh, so we sacrifice research grants to save money?

It is not free to hire staff to apply for and manage grants!

[MarlinMan3]

Seems the academic field.of sports management has been growing and produces PHDs, are no grants available in that arena for research and the staff and money would be in athletucs department. See also sabremetric type studies