Portal Tracker (Outbound)

[CajunVic]

It is not. Not even by a long shot.

please explain your thoughts - NIL is a mechanism for the athlete to make money off the back of university support which was not there because it was prohibited by NCAA (and previously unavailable other than through a bagman - the university’s bagman who got money from university supporters or investors) now with the recognized constitutional right of the athlete to earn money, all that did was remove the need for the bagman - the money is still coming to the athlete from a university supporter, not an athlete supporter - once the athlete is no longer at the university there is no longer a return on investment sought by the Invester - winning

[Turbine]

please explain your thoughts - NIL is a mechanism for the athlete to make money off the back of university support which was not there because it was prohibited by NCAA (and previously unavailable other than through a bagman - the university’s bagman who got money from university supporters or investors) now with the recognized constitutional right of the athlete to earn money, all that did was remove the need for the bagman - the money is still coming to the athlete from a university supporter, not an athlete supporter - once the athlete is no longer at the university there is no longer a return on investment sought by the Invester - winning

That is a guise, there is no mention of the universities in any of the NIL commercials

The legal value is in the athlete's persona not the universitie's persona.

It is use of the person''s Likeness, the person's Image, the persons Name.

The school is not in the constitutional LINk.

[CajunVic]

That is a guise, there is no mention of the universities in any of the NIL commercials

The legal value is in the athlete's persona not the universitie's persona.

It is use of the person''s Likeness, the person's Image, the persons Name.

The school is not in the constitutional LINk.

this is so silly

for argument’s sake, let’s say a good annual figure for Louisiana NIL is $1mm

under your allocation assumption, if NIL athletes must continue to be paid when they leave Louisiana in the second year Louisiana’s NIL cost would be $2mm, year 3, $3mm and so on

I know, you are using this silly position to next posture that this is unsustainable

this is a classic instance of bad info in = bad info out and an abuse of allocation assumptions to the point that your position is so silly to even consider any further

while easy, this would be considered more of an un-fix than fix

[Duggie35]

I can't wait to see what will happen when the first time an NFL player, who entered the draft early, will want to transfer back to college in order to increase his pay and improve his draft stock the second time around.

[CajunRed]

I can't wait to see what will happen when the first time an NFL player, who entered the draft early, will want to transfer back to college in order to increase his pay and improve his draft stock the second time around.

That thought is pretty hilarious... but not out of the question.

[Turbine]

The investment is in the university - that’s why

Again that is a guise.

Money that once went to the university (for discretionary use) is now preempted to an individual.

[CajunVic]

Again that is a guise.

Money that once went to the university (for discretionary use) is now preempted to an individual.

but only while they are at the university - don’t move the goal posts on us

[Turbine]

but only while they are at the university - don’t move the goal posts on us

The pay to play bribes won't last. It will be fixed.

[CajunVic]

The pay to play bribes won't last. It will be fixed.

delusional

[Turbine]

but only while they are at the university - don’t move the goal posts on us

Just looking at players who stay where their trafficked, not the ones who escape to be trafficked again.

If NIL value was REAL, if it was TANGIBLE, if it had ROI then the same source of money would follow the honorable athlete after their designated stint at said school.

The fact that it takes money from the school under the guise of advertising value but suddenly drops off a cliff shows that the value was never there.