lots of the usm fans aren't real sold on Huff, a discussion a couple of weeks ago with a season ticket holder was yea we won some games but we aren't really that good and the usm fan base isn't sold that he can recruit in this footprint
lots of the usm fans aren't real sold on Huff, a discussion a couple of weeks ago with a season ticket holder was yea we won some games but we aren't really that good and the usm fan base isn't sold that he can recruit in this footprint
Or how about, not when a coach leaves...but only if and when a new coach arrives.... i.e. if you promote from within, like we did with dez, then nobody can leave. And even if instead a new coach does come from outside, you have to wait until they are there, so rather than rushing to hire. It would be smart to delay the hire until after therl regular portal closes
Sorry to tell you but it is far worse than 50/50 . . . over my 40 years in the industry I figure that about 15% of all lawyers are good lawyers . . . about another 15 percent are ok and you get above average representation from those . . . the rest pretty much suck - and every lawyer trying to lawyer outside of their expertise or wheelhouse also end up pretty much sucking - however, it’s not hard to see or opine where the Supreme Court will or will not go as it pertains to their opinion handed down on NIL and there are sports people, great lawyers, agents and people much much smarter then me, you and surely smarter than anyone on this Louisiana message board who have spent an inordinate amount of time and effort trying to address, defeat, sidetrack, lessen effect, change effect of the NIL decision on college sports - and to date every one of them have failed - the reason is what the Supreme Court handed down was a specific simple concept and there is probably NO, NO, NO, NO WAY AROUND IT - and, as highly improbable that there is a solution - if one happens it will not come from the repeated silly suggestions posted on this board . . .
It ill be interesting to see what happens to "lawyers" in the future. Chat GPT / AI (not the free versions) are incredible - to me, lawyers will be the "human carriers" to court of the arguements for the case that AI spits out. The most important person in a law firm will be the person who can prompt AI correctly and really knows how to use it lol. I've seen it in action in the last 3 months and yes, it still has some kinks to work out, but it's fricking incredible when you have it dialed in to your case specifics. The "billing hours" SHOULD be dramatically reduced, but.... it will be interesting
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)