From what little I know it's saying our brand has the worst marketability or the least positively received marketability in the conference, right?
From what little I know it's saying our brand has the worst marketability or the least positively received marketability in the conference, right?
"Earned media" is a part of this equation. We have not been on TV much this year. That might have something to do with this chart.
Has Maggard overstayed his stay? Sometimes we just need a fresh start with new ideas. He did good for a little while, but maybe we need a fresh new AD with new ideas willing to try new things.
And yet, we are still the lowest. Updated numbers would likely be worse. We have no fan support, poor attendance, dropping revenue, an apathetic student body, we are losing in just about every sport, and we are last in the conference in Media Value. And, our university is $25M in the red. How does that translate into a winning athletic department and leadership? We are making a change in university leadership with a new incoming President. Should our new President make a change in athletic leadership and take this school in a new direction? We can't continue the status quo. It ain't working.
I’d like to see the figures used to populate this chart as there’s no way I’m believing the metropolis of Monroe has more media value. Above Mobile as well? What would possibly push ULM above?
CoPilot:
Here are the estimated local TV advertising revenues based on market share:
Market Estimated Revenue
Lafayette, LA $118,170,000
Monroe, LA $83,022,000
Geaux Cajuns
There are currently 14 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 13 guests)