....in addition to making McNeese, Nicholls St, SLU, and NSULA all UL (Insert City Name)
We should operate just like Texas A&M and their satellite campuses.
....in addition to making McNeese, Nicholls St, SLU, and NSULA all UL (Insert City Name)
We should operate just like Texas A&M and their satellite campuses.
Emily Cundiff
@emilycundiff_
·
Oct 1
The City of Birmingham is spending $200,000 on UAB football tickets this season — and giving them away to residents
Council says it’s about building a fan base and boosting local support for the Blaze
I agree, I don't understand why the need to either/or to the exclusion of the other.
Especially since UL did just that when it was first established as.an "Industrial Institute"
The pivot must have begun right away though, because I think it was the first Governor Foster who rolled through and declared "there's to much learning going on."
You absolutely don't want to do this. Let me give you an analogy. Take a Formula One car, driver and pit crew and ask them to show up at your son's go-cart racetrack for the big race and help out. What do you think would happen??
Same thing here. You don't want the people managing PHd programs also being responsible for 2 year associates degrees in a trade. It will not work. In fact it is already proven. Once the "trade schools" started converting to Jr. Colleges to feed the four year programs the emphasis on the trades has declined. Trust me I try to hire from them and the quality of education under most circumstances is suspect. Often times they are teaching technology that was left in the dust a decade ago.
Not to mention the kids who are going for a trade skill would never fork over the same type of money as those pursuing a four year degree.
First, there would have to be separate pricing for Trade programs versus any Academic degree.
Second, I wouldn't want our current Deans and Admin running a Trade college either.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)