Page 54 of 57 FirstFirst ... 44 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 LastLast
Results 531 to 540 of 570

Thread: Tech to the Belt?

  1. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    I seem to recall UTPA and Denver leaving at the same time.

    Denver was because they didn't sponsor enough sports
    You might be a couple decades off. UTPA left in late 90’s. Denver was around until the early 2010s I think

  2. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by BabbForHeisman View Post
    You might be a couple decades off. UTPA left in late 90’s. Denver was around until the early 2010s I think
    Something coincided.

    Maybe UTPA left and Denver took their place.

    Don't trust my memory

    Geaux Cajuns

  3. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Bulldog fans doing work on Wikipedia hahahaha

    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    To some extent you are correct. But ULM has the law behind them, they are a founding member in football and the SBC Bylaws protects all of us including UL. They would need and almost unanimous vote to be removed. I'm not sure ASU and UL would vote against them.

    Now if the UL System Board comes back and forces them to make the decision because of audits and lack of funds, that is possible scenario. But be careful what you ask for when it comes to state politics.
    How does being a new member in "football only" give ULM "founder" status for the whole conference?

  5. #535

    Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    How does being a new member in "football only" give ULM "founder" status for the whole conference?
    It doesn't.

  6. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    It doesn't.
    ULM would be a perfect fit for CUSA.

  7. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonCajun View Post
    ULM would be a perfect fit for CUSA.
    actually they would be more of a fit in the Southland.

  8. #538

    Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    The easiest way to deal with ULM is to not force tech into the SBC, add the best schools regardless of location, and force minimum funding standards. They will then leave on their own. After that, bringing in tech might, MIGHT, make sense.


  9. #539

    Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    How does being a new member in "football only" give ULM "founder" status for the whole conference?
    ULM was amongst the founding Football members Turbine. SBC has no Football then. Check the bylaws bro!

  10. Default Re: Tech to the Belt?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    ULM was amongst the founding Football members Turbine. SBC has no Football then. Check the bylaws bro!
    I've never seen the SBC bylaws, (or when they were rewritten) thats why I asked.

    Geaux Cajuns

Page 54 of 57 FirstFirst ... 44 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)

  1. CAJUNSby90

Similar Threads

  1. BB Final UL 6, Tech 16
    By NewsCopy in forum RagePage
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: April 6th, 2025, 09:38 am
  2. La Tech and Marshall impact
    By GoneGolfin in forum RagePage
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: May 4th, 2024, 03:16 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •