I would like to think I am pretty plugged in through the softball world. I will say this, I am familiar enough to have an opinion but smart enough not to share said opinion in an open forum.
Honestly, just out of respect for each of those young ladies and their families my personal opinion is irrelevant. In my experiences over the years seeing players through the process, what a player is through HS and travel ball is very seldom an absolute indication of what they will be in College once all the underlying factors come into play. Sure, you have to be good in both HS and travel ball BUT, I think "tools" are much more important than any stat ever (all due respect VO). As I have mentioned in my earlier comments, so many factors go into determining these young ladies productivity its extremely hard to predict.
I personally pull for the individual athletes in hopes that they each have great experiences, perform at their best with confidence and can leave any program a better individual than when they got there. If they can do those things, they have been successful in my humble opinion. I know that's not the answer most on here want to hear, but it's just my take on it.
PS, I will say I personally believe Emma Bailey has the tools to compete athletically at UL. Not sure why she wasn't given an opportunity but it was a miss in my opinion. I wish her nothing but the best during her time at Creighton and I pray she is successful and makes their program better.