Realized I had some apples I was comparing oranges to.
The clerk, the assessor, and the sheriff, I’m pretty sure are mandated by the state that parish has to provide.
Drainage and roads (among other things) will theoretically be optional.
Local government doesn’t necessarily have to provide the services, so we wouldn’t be subject to the same funding standards as the three I mentioned.
With the failure to pass those two renewals, I think they’re at that point.
I remember a previous PW worker saying that in the old days, Parish Public Works only paved a few roads and cleaned a few ditches.
They’re not even gonna be able to do that in the not too distant future.
It’s gonna suck to be in the parish
The charter required that we give a report to the planning commission on the CIP‘s consistency with the comp plan.
I got to prepare that report each year since we started to do it in 2016 or 2017.
I enjoyed it, it was a lot of fun, and I was literally one of only six people that saw the initial budgeting recommendations for the CIP.
We would identify specific projects in the CIP that would be consistent with action items in the comp plan. Only one year where we able to do that with the parish. Every other year, it was basically just maintenance.
And with the failure of these two renewals, it’s gonna Be hard to do even that.
I think I brought all the reports with me. I’m gonna go do some looking.
Moncus Park is privately managed. https://moncuspark.org/board/
Lafayette has tried several times to get a loop, and failed. We should have gotten one with I-10, but we were jammed by local industry. We later had one on the table, and a single farmer stopped it.
The land is not available any more. The only way we could get one now is to include routes that go outside the parish... which makes the price incredible, π × d... every increase in diameter is multiplied over 3 times in the circumference.
There is one nice aspect. It used to be thought that more roads relieved congestion. They do not.
They stimulate growth, and paradoxically aggravate congestion.
We don't want to be so sure the grass is greener on the other side of the Interstate.
I’ve heard that money was borrowed by the Parish from the city.
But were these actually 401 dollars that were used? If that’s the case, there’s a huge problem, but there would be no person left to take responsibility.
But with The tax renewal failures, they just might not be enough money to pay it back.
If it was 261, You might have a tougher argument about it being “borrowed.“
For everybody else, 401 and 261 are simply fund numbers that LCG uses.
401 dollars are city sales tax dollars collected in the city of Lafayette to be used for projects in the city of Lafayette.
261 Our taxes collected throughout the entire parish, including all of the municipalities. This is a fun strictly for drainage projects and the money can be used for drainage projects in any part of the parish.
Sorry for being that dweeby guy.
I'm well aware. The private management did a poor job of planning for parking and it impacted local businesses creating parking issues for their customers.
I'm not a fan of the university selling the property to LCG and then it becoming Moncus Park. Our state universities are strapped for cash, this property could have generated cash for UL.
Geaux Cajuns
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)