Some of us just have a personal preference of the beauty of live oaks > a stadium facade. I don't think anyone here ever said they want to preserve trees because of tree-hugging preservation, we just like the beauty of live oaks.
If you look at any architectural rendering of any project period, architects make sure to include plenty of well-established trees to make their project look better. Twice now you've invoked the politically charged issue of abortion in this thread, I think you need to go take a walk and enjoy some trees my friend.
Wait until all the construction is complete, materials gone, and site is cleaned up. Think everyone will be happy.
We are LOUISIANA. Oak trees (at least the most magnificent ones) are LOUISIANA. Not only are they a staple of the University, but they are a staple of our home and our culture. I'm no tree hugger, but having grown up here and attending UL, I associate oaks and cypress with my University and my home. Aesthetically speaking, my only heartbreak is that no effort has been made to somehow deal with the trees that have been lost, so as to maintain the best visual appeal possible. That could mean replacing those that have been lost, or even removal of a few trees to allow others room to grow and/or further enhance the view.
I totally get the obscurity factor from the road since the stadium looks half as tall as before.
I still think a walk way around the stadium close to the architecture with giant Oaks (not just a parking lot) just beyond is going to give the best overall experience.
Geaux Cajuns
There are currently 39 users browsing this thread. (7 members and 32 guests)