I’m gonna go a little off the grid. While I completely agree need a coach who will engage the community hard, I think another direction can be considered.
I want a program with an identity, and I think the current landscape kills that since most players are now looking for the next offer.
So let’s get “ball players.” Run a system (triangle or “Princeton style,” etc) that teams will have a hard time game-planning for b/c they don’t see it during the year. Think Denver back in the day (believe Joe Scott was the coach) but with better players since won’t have the academic restrictions.
Going to require high ball IQ, which I think fans will appreciate.
If disagree, I get it. But either way need a coach who knows how to manage a program (probably the biggest thing that kills new HCs).
Surround themselves with coaches who can help with their weakness, whether it’s recruiting, strategy, teaching, whatever.
Their strength has to be fan/alumni/donor engagement, and they have to be willing to spend more time on that than they likely have in their current role. Have to have a staff they can trust to manage the day-to-day.