You think NIL is greedy, a good bit of the 99% that go pro in something else don’t take rejection well. Unjustified termination suits will abound. Book it.
It’s really coming from TV revenue, produced by the athletes. That’s the only schools who will choose to participate that have the tv revenue. Revenue sharing and making a kid sit out to transfer(not being able to make NIL) being unconstitutional are two different things.
Absolutly two different things.
However the revenue is based on the standing operating infrastructure built by the universities. Not the athletes.
If it were the athletes, you would see floating payouts based on who lost players to the portal, how many 5 stars were signed, who led the nation in this that and the other.
They are paying for the programs standing operations, it is not based on who or whom they are fielding. The closest that comes to reality is perhaps it is based on the "perception" of who they are fielding.
You are right about the "two different things" though.
If NIL is truly NIL [Hint: It isn't] the NIL deal would follow the player to his new destination. Also, if NIL were truly NIL, the NIL deal would not have a requirement to enroll at any specific institution, though it might have requirements to enroll in a certain level of institution or a sliding scale of payment dependent on the level of the institution chosen by the player, or on the TV revenue of the conference in which said institution resides.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)