The one thing that is always missing in these analysis is that, for all practical purposes, a 2 for 1 only pays off if you win away . . . that’s the real gamble . . . If you don’t, then it becomes a true negatator which eventually is not recoverable financially . . .
Yes sir. And, I seriously respect your knowledge in athletic matters. While it might be that you are on to something, that no one, or very few have ever done this, is reason to question the feasibility. I understand that, sometimes, out of the box thinking results in home runs, or at least triples, but the odds are much against it, and I don't think the athletic budget is such that you want to take a chance.
Let JMU or App St, schools that are in much better financial shape, give it a try and see what the result is.
I don't think beating Lamar at home is of any more benefit to future attandance than losing to say Nebraska on the road.
Two home games against FCS would have to offset the $6 million Louisiana can get from playing a beatable P4 twice on the road, plus the gate when Nebraska comes to Louisiana.
The extra home games are super valuable to Nebraska.
If the P4 get the contract they are expecting $3 million payouts will be the norm.
This year Texas paid UTSA $1.7 mil
Auburn paid New Mexico $1.9 mil
Lots of other examples.
Nebraska craves home games because thy all sell out, but they also want quality opponents.
With Louisiana having been ranked for two of the last 4 years possible 3 of the last 5 if they win out, negotiating value has never been higher.
One away game for 3 home games is something a school like Nebraska would jump at.
Two pay, one no pay.
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 11 guests)