That’s an entirely different take. You were saying before that because Napier never let him call plays, that means he didn’t think he was good enough to call plays, therefore he wasn’t good enough to be head coach.
Again, I thought originally it was too soon for him. But I’m not going to let that past belief color how I see this year’s performance.
That’s usually where I stand. Most of us are just not knowledgeable enough about what we are watching to pick out in real time if a play failed because of the call, or the read, or the execution. Unless there is a clear case like a drop or badly missed tackle. I’d bet some pla calls we thought were bad, if we looked at in slow motion with more knowledge of the big picture we would see were not so bad. And some ____ calls that worked out due to athleticism or luck.
Napier never let him call plays. The very job the traditionally assigned to the offensive coordinator. Even by some of the best offensive minds to ever coach the game.
That means he didn’t think he was either not good enough to call plays, or not as good as me, therefore it is a stretch jump recomendation since he is openly reccomending someone he believes is not as good as himself.
Because of the Napier handcuffs, we will never know how much worse than himself he thought Desormeaux actually was.
In effect Napier was saying: "He's not good enough for me, but he's good enough for you."
Not diametrically opposed, its just UL had an unknown unknown on its hands.
I'm going to hold off my judgement of Billy at Florida until next year only because Dan Mullen left the cupboard very bare down there by burning bridges with many local Florida high schools that Billy had to go and make amends with. I personally think he will get another year to prove himself, but next year it's win or go home for him.
But I will say that I agree with you in the fact that Des and company have done a very good job creating a culture of retention in the NIL world compared to other G5 schools, and that has showed so far this season with the number of players we have been able to keep around and win with. But I also think those close losses also turned into learning experiences on how to handle close games this season as well whether it is a play call or handling personel.
The good news with Des is he still has a ton of upside.
Mainly the running game. Several stretch plays were called that resulted in minimal or negative results. When we ran out of the pistol straight at the defense we gashed them. Part of that was blocking schemes and matchups. We failed to take advantage of what was working.
Passing game, was pretty good. It’s harder to tell on TV when you can’t see the entire field. Some could be Woolridge, a few were just not good calls. Overall the passing game was good.
Regardless, the argument of Napier this vs Dez that is pointless.
Keep winning and vie for the CFP slot.
There are currently 22 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 22 guests)