100% agree. Going for 2 was absolutely the right call.
Just rewatched game.....
Offense: less the 2nd quarter int, and a handful of errant throws to open receivers offensively for 3.5 quarters we actually did quite well. Could tell Ben was making RPO calls at line correctly. We scored and moved the ball as well, if not better than OU the week before in those 3.5 quarters.
Last 2 possessions were the difference. Ben looked lost /hesitant when Tulane predictably blitzed. Receivers were open
Defense:
Inability to stop 1 running back lost this game. Period. It wasnt our offense or going for 2. It was 100% that bull Tulane had at RB and their OL doing enough to get him moving forward. Also we put pressure on Mensah often and it effected his accuracy or forced short attempts but not getting any sacks? None at all was painful. We absolutely needed big plays on D to neutralize that bull's effectiveness and it never happened