NOAA issues its most aggressive hurricane season forecast on record

[SlickRick]

https://x.com/jasonjamesbnn/status/1.306529634?s=19

[CajunRebel]

https://x.com/jasonjamesbnn/status/1.306529634?s=19

Why would anyone think this is a good argument?

[moorecajun]

https://x.com/jasonjamesbnn/status/1.306529634?s=19

Numbers. When you look at it that way, what's the issue?

Nice post, Slick!

[billbeck451]

how many of the storms that they name now would not have been named before, they were discussed and the experts would say their is a disTurbinece and it wouldn't really form or they said this is going out to sea and it wouldn't get named, so while we all enjoyed the break we mostly had in the 70's and 80's where we were in a very quiet cycle we really aren't seeing a more storms than before just more are getting named. How many of the "storms" last year wouldn't have been named in past years. Part of the problem now is disaster or weather porn where every thunderstorm gets hyped. Just look at this week if you looked at social media you would have thought that a strong storm was heading to the gulf just because a wave was being shown on one projection model.
I follow https://Hurricanetrack.com as the guide that I use because Mark Sudduth is level headed and still analyzes data and doesn't hype just for clicks.

[ZoomZoom]

Numbers. When you look at it that way, what's the issue?

Nice post, Slick!

ALWAYS follow the money. Does not matter the cause, NGO, government, church, business, whatever. ALWAYS follow the money.

Such as the obvious push to name any swirl of clouds, especially close to the US. Named weather system, hurricane deductible kicks in. Monetary move, framed with “climate change”.


Points of reference, the deadliest. Interesting point, Katrina not on list. Won’t touch that political hot potato.

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdeadlyapp1.shtml?

With today’s generation’s attention span of a gnat, all history seems to be forgotten. But Solomon was right, nothing new.

[Big Tyme]

how many of the storms that they name now would not have been named before, they were discussed and the experts would say their is a disTurbinece and it wouldn't really form or they said this is going out to sea and it wouldn't get named, so while we all enjoyed the break we mostly had in the 70's and 80's where we were in a very quiet cycle we really aren't seeing a more storms than before just more are getting named. How many of the "storms" last year wouldn't have been named in past years. Part of the problem now is disaster or weather porn where every thunderstorm gets hyped. Just look at this week if you looked at social media you would have thought that a strong storm was heading to the gulf just because a wave was being shown on one projection model.
I follow https://Hurricanetrack.com as the guide that I use because Mark Sudduth is level headed and still analyzes data and doesn't hype just for clicks.

Maybe the issue is where some of you are getting your info. Not one forecaster said anything about a storm from that one model run. The drama y'all complain about is coming from inside your house.

[Big Tyme]

https://x.com/jasonjamesbnn/status/1.306529634?s=19

LOL. That is NOT a good take. Concentration is not an indicator of effect. 1/48000 of a teaspoon of botulism toxin is lethal.

[ZoomZoom]

LOL. That is NOT a good take. Concentration is not an indicator of effect. 1/48000 of a teaspoon of botulism toxin is lethal.

Or even lesser, fentanyl. ��

[SlickRick]

LOL. That is NOT a good take. Concentration is not an indicator of effect. 1/48000 of a teaspoon of botulism toxin is lethal.

.and reducing carbon in the atmosphere will not benefit plant life, will it? Have they, ie. climate alarmist, told the plants that they need to get off CO2 yet?

[Big Tyme]

.and reducing carbon in the atmosphere will not benefit plant life, will it? Have they, ie. climate alarmist, told the plants that they need to get off CO2 yet?

"Won't someone think of the plants?" was not on my Bingo card today.

[Big Tyme]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TropicalWea.t=share_button

EVERYONE panic!!!!

[60swerethebest]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TropicalWea.t=share_button

EVERYONE panic!!!!

We’re down to only 70% chance of nothing happening. And if it does Mexico gets needed rain.

And now KADN says FEMA has conducted a study and Lafayette is the most at risk city/parish in LA. Worse than NO and Jefferson. One of the reasons is that NO has levees. O dear. I can only imagine the depth of that study. Must have been based on its Lafayettes turn. Scary bad analysis. Obviously not UL grads.

[HelmutVII]

time to refresh your Hurricane links


Mikes weather page

https://www.spaghettimodels.com/


NOAA

https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/


And the most definitive source of information Dr. Levi Cowan is the boss.

https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/

[ZoomZoom]

https://www.reddit.com/r/TropicalWea.t=share_button

EVERYONE panic!!!!

Goodness knows our local yokel weathermen are trying. Darla kinda reeled Heath in at 5:00 report by emphasizing “potential”.

[CajunRed]

https://x.com/jasonjamesbnn/status/1.306529634?s=19

That was awesome to watch.