It's a matter of redirecting funds. Is the RCAF removed to allow for direct funding? Are staffs cut to allow for player payouts? Are admin seats removed to generate funds? Are coaches asked to make $100K investments in their teams? Maybe, and hear me out, maybe the staff for either athletics or RCAF try to find new donors by selling a dream. Maybe there's hope that UL can be the poster child for pushing through when all other contemporaries say "G5 doesn't have to, so we won't".
This is the moment in time, many have been warning of. Most thought it'd be conference realignment; it isn't conference - it's cash. UL can build a new dream with a new home, by forgoing other conference-isms, and going head-first into payments.
Admittedly, I don't like the thought of paying kids huge monies, when the paying public makes less than them. But, these are the rules given. So, you can either beat them at their own game, or concede. I don't suggest choosing concede.