I know they wanted to preserve the trees on the west side so that is why they chose to chomp at the upper deck instead of implosion. Can someone in the know tell me the difference in time/cost? I feel like had we done the implosion the stadium would have been ready for this past season. I’m probably wrong but still curious.
I seriously doubt that. Most implosions are capable of controlling the debris very tightly. I know when the tower in Lake Charles was imploded last year the whole building came down very close to the original footprint. I personally talked with the person responsible for clearing the area before and after the implosion. Two pieces of plywood (other than paper and light weight materials) was the only thing found outside of the original building area.
Implosions aren't always the most economical means of taking large structures down. I suspect that was the case with the stadium.
It's certainly a big project. I think you're talking about that very nice oak they moved to Weeks Island Rd. and 90?
If that's the same one, I passed by not all that long ago and could not believe all that work, which was successful and she's breathing, was surrounded by much needed TLC i.e. grass High, weeds and other bs. Of course bound to happen. Oak looked very strong.
TG area is ready for Oaks. Way past time to improve that bald landscape. That Grove at Ole' Miss is putting us to shame.
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)