Tamera Johnson hitting the portal.
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php/?id=100042074305938
Both you gentlemen are correct (I’m in the senior discount crowd too). Target market needs to be 25-45. Yes, that might move out us older fans, but if UL athletically is to survive, so be it.
But under no circumstances should older fans be taken for granted like they are today. It is disturbing to hear as people drop out, they receive MAYBE a phone call asking why. Heck, even XM radio will hunt down former customers like a Snap On Tools salesman driving thru a graveyard (IYK, YK). UL presently goes “Meh”.
I guess I didn’t think that just pointing out a serious flaw in the Athletics Dept policy and philosophy regarding fans was as bad as the Dept actually IMPLEMENTING that flawed policy. But… I trust Turbine… if he thinks it is too negative and somehow hurting our program, he can delete or suggest that I do it… and I won’t be offended.
My frustration is that they appear to make mistakes over and over again without anyone seeming to step forward to point them out and suggest a better approach.
"Fellow fan" is living in reality.
Maggard is living on the spreadsheet bottom line.
Problem is there are not enough entries in the tailgate column since the increases started.
I doubt they are pulling in now what they pulled in when prices were attractive.
They are pulling in roughly 25% of what they did in 2018 or so, which is the last time the lot was full. And I used the situation with RV football parking as simply an example of such a misinformed approach to attracting and retaining a respectable size fan base. The mistakes are numerous and widespread.
There are currently 257 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 257 guests)