“Like”
Re: RIP NCAA
“… Opportunities for the betterment of the student athlete…”
I.e. how do we keep all of the money?
The G5 needs to stand strong and tell these money, hungry _____es to go F themselves with their “money games.“
You want separation? I got your separation right here.
Let’s see how the big fish in this new alignment gets tired of splitting money with Vanderbilt and wake Forest, and the rest of the bottom dwellers.
There aren’t enough F’s, that can possibly satisfy the need need for them to go F themselves
Oh, and they can eat a bag of weenies while they do this.
When the woke NCAA begin allowing trans men to compete in women's sports, they totally lost me. The NCAA itself is lost. Yeah, we're staring at a new professional division of college football breaking away from NCAA within next five years. Then the big P4's will thin their herds. Thought it would be another 10 years away but seems closer now. We already exist in a haves and have nots college football world. The next stage of separation within the G5 level is which of those 64 football programs convert to professional non-NCAA model outside of Title IX?
Clemson has filed against the ACC in Pickens County, South Carolina, a source confirms to ESPN. This is the second lawsuit that the ACC faces, as Florida State and the ACC currently have dueling lawsuits.
— Pete Thamel (@PeteThamel) March 19, 2024
Might see North Carolina and Virginia jump on this bandwagon before too long.
There is only so many slots realistically out there where it breaks to the number they desire. Washington State and Oregon State are not the only P5's that's going to be left behind at the train station holding their junk. Clemson and FSU already working on an out as we speak.
NEWS: College presidents and top executives have devised a "Super League" to transform college football as they believe the current system is "doomed" and headed for "bankruptcy," leaders tell The Athletic. (w/@slmandel)
The inside story
"headed for "bankruptcy"
Since there isn't a single entity paying everyone, how does this not prove existing collusion?
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)