Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 56

Thread: ULM profiting more?

  1. #1

    Default ULM profiting more?

    How?

    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. #2

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    ??? The graph is our revenues.


  3. #3

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Without looking at a side-by-side comparison, how?


  4. #4

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    I didn't realize I could do both at the same time.


  5. Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    I want Louisiana to go after their guarantee money.

    Boost recruiting, "Anytime any where. "


  6. #6

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    I want Louisiana to go after their guarantee money.

    Boost recruiting, "Anytime any where. "
    While the liberties, coastal carolinas and tulanes of the world are playing in the playoff game and we are in nola bowl with 2-3 almost guarantee losses...no thanks

  7. Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunJack55 View Post
    While the liberties, coastal carolinas and tulanes of the world are playing in the playoff game and we are in nola bowl with 2-3 almost guarantee losses...no thanks
    If you don't play the best you will never improve.

  8. #8

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    If you don't play the best you will never improve.
    If you play a good schedule and win 11 or 12 games, you have a shot. Napier beat one P5 team, Iowa St. and finished in the Top 25 twice. He didn't use your model of playing 3 guaranteed games a season like ULM. That model is outdated unless you want to start conference play with 3 losses every season.

  9. Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    If you play a good schedule and win 11 or 12 games, you have a shot. Napier beat one P5 team, Iowa St. and finished in the Top 25 twice. He didn't use your model of playing 3 guaranteed games a season like ULM. That model is outdated unless you want to start conference play with 3 losses every season.
    You dont think Napier could have won another Iowa St level game?

    The bowl scenario would have been totally diferent and who knows what else.

  10. #10

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    If you play a good schedule and win 11 or 12 games, you have a shot. Napier beat one P5 team, Iowa St. and finished in the Top 25 twice. He didn't use your model of playing 3 guaranteed games a season like ULM. That model is outdated unless you want to start conference play with 3 losses every season.
    We never get the national ranking without beating Iowa State first. The odds of us getting another program changing win double if we schedule 2 of these per year instead of 1.

  11. #11

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    We never get the national ranking without beating Iowa State first. The odds of us getting another program changing win double if we schedule 2 of these per year instead of 1.
    Agreed. How do you think Florida State did it in the 70's? Anybody, anywhere. Took em a decade of beating the LSUs of the world, but they would have never gotten there with UL's mindset of today, that's for sure.

  12. #12

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    If you play a good schedule and win 11 or 12 games, you have a shot. Napier beat one P5 team, Iowa St. and finished in the Top 25 twice. He didn't use your model of playing 3 guaranteed games a season like ULM. That model is outdated unless you want to start conference play with 3 losses every season.
    The model still works, beat a P5 and you will get 10 times more recognition and it can spring you into the rankings, as beating Iowa St. did. If you don't play P5's, you can't beat them and the schedule will be considered weak overall no matter what Sun Belt teams you beat. I think it's a mistake not to schedule at least 2 per year.

  13. #13

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    You dont think Napier could have won another Iowa St level game?

    The bowl scenario would have been totally diferent and who knows what else.
    Yes, and he played 1 P5 in 2020 and 1 P5 in 2021, UL ranked both seasons. In 2021 UL won 12 games and lost at Texas. The difference, only 1 loss during the season and won the conference championship. That is the path, not playing multiple P5 programs on the road. Beating a P5 on the road is great, but it's not the model needed.

  14. #14

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by ULGrad@HOU View Post
    The model still works, beat a P5 and you will get 10 times more recognition and it can spring you into the rankings, as beating Iowa St. did. If you don't play P5's, you can't beat them and the schedule will be considered weak overall no matter what Sun Belt teams you beat. I think it's a mistake not to schedule at least 2 per year.
    How many did UL play in 2020 and 2021? The path needed is winning the conference championships and defeating everyone on your conference schedule.

  15. #15

    Default Re: ULM profiting more?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    We never get the national ranking without beating Iowa State first. The odds of us getting another program changing win double if we schedule 2 of these per year instead of 1.
    Yet the better season was in 2021. We didn't beat Texas and defeated everyone on our conference schedule and won the SBC Championship. You don't get there by playing multiple P5's on the road every year. As for getting ranked, how did that work for Liberty?

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •