So, can someone identify exactly what it was the university was asked to do which was refused?
I get very wary of a complaint from the private sector where it’s not worth their work and effort to make money but it’s worth the work and effort of another. Need a little more information from the source, not just someone on a message board alligatoring around.
The simple answer is that UL athletics, is going to die on the vine. Unless they make big changes to capture the 20-40 age group, the programs will not make it long term.
I know a lot of people who have pulled back from supporting the way they used to and the reasons range from time to no longer being interested in the product.
But didn't the restaurant who did it say "it was not worth the trouble and effort"
You throw "easy" and "lazy" around like they mean something while at the same time appear to be too lazy to look at what is easy to see in this discussion. Without more information as to why the restaurant felt it was too much trouble to do it again and exactly what they are requesting be shifted to the university, this is just another thread to trash the university. The Good Lawd knows we have enough ammunition in that respect without possibly making up something that is really not there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)