Why would OLOL and the other major stadium renovation donors move forward with their substantial financial commitments if they have even a feeling that the 'solution' MH will come up with is to fix up the stadium, charge prime rib (or higher) prices, and continue to serve roast beef.
And if such donors don’t believe that, why would anyone here post things to try and convince them to do so?
What is the advantage a poster believes he/she will gain for their university by such a course of action?
Please walk us through that thought process.
When I read this paragraph, I am sitting here scratching my head wondering if we are living in the same universe. "The products have stayed the same for 30 years?" So, are we talking about the product on the Football Field, Baseball Diamond or Softball Field? Or are we talking about ancillary products like concessions, music, mascots, etc. Because outside of the last two years under Desormeaux and the last few years under Hudspeth this has been the greatest run of football success in the modern era for this program. You were on the sideline during the Bustle and Hudspeth era, but you lost your passion? I have a hard time connecting the two considering the mediocrity of the product at times, coming from the vast waste land of obscurity under Baldwin. The Softball and Baseball product and experience are still very good.
When you say this is an evolving industry, I don't disagree with you. But we knew what kind of financial commitment would have to be made after the Mike Alden came in and showed Dr. Savoy what it would take financially to compete and grow the Ragin' Cajun athletic program. You had first-hand knowledge of this because your family member was right in the middle of that change and transition. We were decades behind App. State and Georgia Southern in moving this program forward. Most people on this board complaining today about cost were the same ones agreeing that many of Alden's recommendations needed to happen to move us on from the Dr. Authement era. There is a direct correlation between funding and the success of Billy Napier winning a championship and being ranked two consecutive seasons in the Top 25. He doesn't accomplish any of it if he doesn't get the financial funding for his staff and support staff. So, let's not pretend there has not been massive improvement in this athletic department from the past 30 years. By any fair measurement this program is light years from where it started after Alden was hired.
Do I think there have been some mistakes made and decisions that I don't agree with along the way? Sure, but have you built your business without any mistakes made in hindsight? I don't dismiss your concerns or anyone else's that have been here supporting this program through the transition from Dr. Authement era to today. Again, my passion has been driven by winning and the ancillary services are secondary to me. I'm not suggesting those are not important when you are raising cost, but we all seem to focus on the negative too much at times and not how far will have come and where we need to be going forward. It all cost money, just like building a house.
A passion for football is great and all, but passion alone isn't going to sustain our (or any) college athletic program from here on out. If it did, modern day college athletes wouldn't need creative teams doing photo shoots, NIL opportunities, handwritten letters every month to make them feel important.
The same upcoming generation of fans that we are asking to come to athletic events belong to the same generation of student athletes that require the above. Dr. Maggard credits CMD with being a tireless recruiter. Perhaps it's time for the administration (academic and athletic) to do some tireless recruiting of the community and newer generation of fans that aren't driven on passion of the sport.
I see Icegators brought up a lot, I don't think a passion for ice hockey was required to sellout the Cajundome.
I don't disagree with anything you stated, but your last sentence is 50% accurate. The Icegators were a novelty to this area and that's all it required for Hockey Fans to come out and watch. Winning early accelerated that interest in the franchise and once it became less of a product while tickets and parking went up the novelty wore off. I had season tickets for a few years, I enjoyed the new experience, but the novelty soon wore off as a hockey game would occasionally break out in-between the WWF events on the ice. I never had a passion for the game like football. Anyone that has ever played the game or loves high school and college football understands exactly what I'm talking about. I never shared that love for ice hockey and many people share that sentiment with me. Football is still #1 in the south.
When talking about products, I am talking about the gameday experience and everything beyond the playing field. The fact of the matter is that the experience has not moved much in the last 30 years in football. If anything, it has gone the opposite way. I definitely understand that we need to make money to generate the revenue to pay for things like coaches salaries and whatnot, and I totally agree that the financial commitment has been light years ahead of where we once were. But the HUGE difference that existed back then and today is the community outreach to local people.
You had mentioned the Bustle years. During the Bustle era, I remember attending a meet and greet in New Orleans (circa 2004) as Coach Bustle, Gerald Hebert, and staff did a presentation of the trajectory of the football program at the time. It was very well attended. I also remember them doing this in other places like Houston and even Baton Rouge(?). They called it "the bus tour" or something of that sort. It was basic community outreach around the area to get people outside of Acadiana involved. They no longer do this. During the Hud era, there was a preseason party at Cypress Bayou Casino to all RCAF members which got fans excited about the upcoming football season. They no longer do this. If anything, the RCAF donation limit was raised to get this invite; and now not many people even go. There were tons of events that were catered to the fans to create involvement that has withered away over the last decade, events that made the community feel included and excited to take part in. And a lot of those times, the end results came with the community pulling out their checkbooks to write checks. If I recall, that was around the same time the RCAF was introduced. Since then, membership has stayed within the same numbers. I see a correlation there.
You know that I am just as passionate as any Cajun fan that posts here or goes to any Cajun sporting event. But I would rather win in a stadium that is more full than half empty. And the way to make the stadium more full is creating opportunities for more local involvement like we used to do.
Acadiana just wants free or below market priced stuff.
The Wildcatters indoor football team played one season in the Dome. Attendance was very marginal until this one game.
I show up and had seats on the rail. By game time, I look back and there are about 7,000 fans in the stands. I knew we had done some type of promotion but was not sure exactly what it was.
When Greg Davis passed by me as the game was starting, I commented that it appeared we had turned the corner. He said, I'm not sure about that, we had about 180 paid for tickets.
The GM was determined to fill the dome and did so by going to all of the local schools and giving away tickets to anyone who would have them.
Moral to the story . . . if you have to give your tickets / parking / concessions away to gain acceptance, you will fail as a business.
That's been the ultimate mystery on Reinhardt Drive: How do we get people to show up without making it close to free?
And I say it's time to think outside of the box on that. Be creative. In Acadiana, we are a different country when it comes to this kind of stuff. The problem is that the current model isn't working. People aren't showing up.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)