Only solution

[CajunVic]

And here we are. Sidetracked as always. Again.

I think I got it:

1. This is no longer a debate forum

2. You are for (a) preach the suck, (b) cancel culture and (c) feelings

3. Any poster who comes here with an opposite view in a thread you participate in is an instigator.

4. In fact, you would go so far as to suggest that posters who challenge you view be placed on ignore.

[CajunVic]

How do you expect to improve unless you are being critical.

How does a Football team improve if you are not fixing mistakes, same with any sport, same with marching band, cheerleading, life, work, kids, religion. If all I did was not push people we would get no where.

Same with the athletic department, you see it and from my perspective if they do not do something they will lose support.

Look you can see what is taking place, that’s why I chose to start this thread to offer solutions.

Not to bash!

. . . were your feelings hurt when Dave showed up on the last RR with some balanced pushback . . . was that not fair content by Dave . . . or, are you only for criticism, even when it goes far beyond constructive criticism . . .

[ULvictory]

I think I got it:

1. This is no longer a debate forum

2. You are for (a) preach the suck, (b) cancel culture and (c) feelings

3. Any poster who comes here with an opposite view in a thread you participate in is an instigator.

4. In fact, you would go so far as to suggest that posters who challenge you view be placed on ignore.

Instigating, name calling, and picking petty arguments isn’t debating. It’s elementary school pettiness.

[ManAboutTown]

. . . so now a post which may be equally important and possibly opposite in debate to “preach the suck” is instigation here . . . ok, my man . . . and yes, I do have a history of being on the opposite side of those that show up here only to “preach the suck” on a sports message board of the team and university which I support and if those I debate with are too weak to take the debate, they are certainly free to use the ignore button . . . but rest assured, all that demonstrates is weakness in their position and most of all weakness in their character . . . imagine a world where you just cancel all of those you don’t agree with . . . we are getting there, but is that the world that you and your fellow RR “preach the suck” boys support . . . RR did not used to be that way, but is has evolved to that . . . how refreshing it was to have Dave there in the last episode to balance the discussion . . . you three were squirming in your chairs and could not wait to have him exit, but he would not go . . . you were like a giddy 13 year old girl when he finally exited and the “preach the suck” could commence unabated for the third hour of the podcast . . . I challenge you to go back and listen to the whole podcast and come back here and let us know if that is not what you see . . . yes, there is a time, a need a value and a limit in constructive criticism . . . that is no longer what you guys stand for . . .

Old man hollering at clouds again.
We have never ever once sought to “create a narrative.” We would not have survived that way. What we have done is reflect what the fanbase was talking about at the time and discussed it on the show. That has been the formula from day 1 and it has worked very well.

You, as Robe said often, are like the majority and think correction is criticism. And your betters send you here, like many others, to attempt to clean up their mess. Transparent as always.

I’ll leave you with this. On two occasions, we went hard in the opposite direction of the fanbase. We implored people to give Bob support going into the 2021 tournament and we explained that Mike Des could actually be one of the most important hires in our history and he deserved our support. On both accounts, we received plenty of blowback. But we stuck to our convictions. I don’t recall you supporting us during those times. No, the only time you show up here is to cause division and seek attention. You hide behind this laughable false sense of virtue. You live in a world where you’re some guiding light of reason.

You’re just a miserable old dude with a weird TSAB complex that gets his jollies off attacking the only real fans we have left.

[Turbine]

. . . so now we are going to talk about feelings . . . how weak are we really as a fan base . . .

Lafayette would still be mailing out redlight camera tickets from that Australian company if they had adopted your no discussion stance on what can be improved around Louisiana Athletics.

jmo

[RedTails]

if those I debate with are too weak to take the debate, they are certainly free to use the ignore button . . .

If you actually engaged in "intellectually honest" debate, you would be a much more enjoyable poster. You don't debate, you argue in its lowest form.

[Cajuns1]

. . . so now we are going to talk about feelings . . . how weak are we really as a fan base . . .

You get upset about backwards caps. How weak are you if that offends you?

[CajunVic]

You get upset about backwards caps. How weak are you if that offends you?

. . .it does not offend me . . . I just suggested that it would be a more professional look for the podcast . . . and feelings turned it into a mandatory effect of the show . . . time cures all and now you see no backwards hats . . . until the next show, I'm sure . . .

[CajunVic]

If you actually engaged in "intellectually honest" debate, you would be a much more enjoyable poster. You don't debate, you argue in its lowest form.

. . . you have become one of my favorite posters . . . I suggest that an open view to the things I post will show that they are the most intellectually honest on this site, however, because I tend to buck the system here, they may not be accepted that way . . . but I will never stop to exercise my fandom in a way to be a shinning star on behalf of Louisiana, its players and its coaches when it is deemed that they are not receiving a fair shake here . . . if that is a problem, so be it . . .

[CajunVic]

Lafayette would still be mailing out redlight camera tickets from that Australian company if they had adopted your no discussion stance on what can be improved around Louisiana Athletics.

jmo

. . .you see, this right here is part of the problem . . . at no point have I ever suggested that there should be "no discussion" on any issue, but you just posted it . . . I am for full discussion, but some here don't want the counterpoint . . . shut up and listen to the suck is what has been told to this board today and now, even you are joining in . . .