UL assistant pool money is the same as when Napier was here!!!
Seems only a matter of time that playoffs see the opt out scenarios as well... why play two extra "free games" that you arent getting paid extra for and have even more chance for injury to hurt future career prospects.
And if the final game gets pushed to an even later date and then falls in the "spring" semester, wouldnt players have to be enrolled (and have progressed on track the entire prior semester) and that would cut down on how many early signees can enroll and remain within roster/scholarship limits
Even in nfl, isnt for postseason games all players still paid a set fee/stipend, which is less than the per game average of the normal salary of over 75 pct of players.
I think that the coaches that work with the head coach are more important than the head coach himself. The head coach is like the CEO and the assistants are like the people who actually run the operation AND GET RESULTS. The CEO (head coach) is to hire good people, make sure they are doing their jobs well, and to include them in the incentives for success. That means the head coach makes less money while attracting fine assistant coaches.
I would like to think I have a legit answer to your question, but I don't know enough about the STAFF SALARIES to honestly answer your question. I just think they need to make a larger percentage of the head coach's salary at our level than the assistants do at the TOP 10 schools.
Missouri scored in the 30s against most of the SEC. They can’t get a freaking yard against Ohio st. And Mizzou don’t have opt outs.
The cotton bowl is like watching paint dry
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)