Let's say the week before the committee makes its playfoo picks the entire starting lineup gets hurt.
This should not factor into who makes the playoffs.
In a true playoff system you would be right. But that’s not what we have. In a system predicated on “picking” the objectively assumed 4 best teams at the time, yes it would.
The problem is this isn’t a real playoff. It’s a year end ranking with a 4 team tournament tacked on. A true playoff would include, at the minimum, all FBS conference champions.
So 1 injury outweighs 1 loss..
If it’s really the best 4 teams at the end of the season, here’s a hypothetical. Let’s say Georgia starts the year with an all American qb coming back from injury and he won’t play till game 4. They start 0-3 then he returns and they win out winning every game by 40 points.
Would that team be considered 1 of the best 4 teams in the country???
Look at the statement again. I didn't say Michigan would beat Alabama, I didn't say I think Michigan is better than Alabama or that Alabama doesn't deserve to be in the playoff. I said it would be more fun to watch Michigan win (by whatever amount, I simply chose 5 touchdowns instead of something else); it would make Alabama look bad, it would make the SEC look bad and it would make the selection committee look bad. That looks fun to me.
all the anti-sec sentiment here, in the southeast. it would only ever be anecdotal, but i wonder, just for a random example, if the fans of the dayton flyers generally hate and pull against the big-10. do richmond spiders fans hate the acc?
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)