Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 105

Thread: QB Doubters still ?

  1. #37

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBoot View Post
    My neffU man uv course da support
    Gotta support the fam man.

  2. #38

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBoot View Post
    My neffU man uv course da support
    I'm happy for Chandler. Dudes a competitor. But you act like the whole world was against him. It wasn't. I think most people believed we had 3 starters who could win games for us. You didn't pick a 200-1 horse in the Kentucky derby. Calm down.

  3. #39

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBoot View Post
    Bad take

    Came in cold after sitting bench all year

    Played good enough against usm
    Defense lost that one . Not him

    Put 282 and 3 TD against Troy which is best D in sunbelt
    Zeon came in cold as a redshirt freshman with a lot less experience. And?

  4. #40

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler View Post
    Zeon came in cold as a redshirt freshman with a lot less experience. And?
    What in the world does my statement have to do with ZC

    This goes back to last year
    Lots of people were delusional think BW was actually a QB
    Bad decision to let that guy play ( last year ) instead of developing CF

  5. #41

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    A new thread of course.

    "Cajun Fields" Delivers.
    BOOM!!

  6. #42

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBoot View Post
    I support ZC 100%

    Last year of CF would have not been “ rotated” things would be Diff

    Same ____ happened to Jake sitting the bench in NOLA
    And that my good man is why I became a diehard Panthers fan in the early 2000’s.
    When Jake came into the game cold, against the Bucs and completed that pass to seal the Saints victory he should have been QB 1 the rest of the year. Instead, the Saints only have to win 1 game of the 3 remaining in 2002 to make the playoffs. They keep using Moron Brooks at 70% and fail. I digress, Mutha Ho-ho’s

    Z

  7. #43

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
    …llBayard and Weber!
    Someone in this Century, Boomer!!

    Z

  8. #44

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler View Post
    LoL! Next do the winning powerball numbers. Dude, get off of that man's jock. It's unsettling.
    Did DaBoot also go to archbishop Rummel? Was he in the special academic tract many athletes take?

  9. #45

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Tyjuan Hayes and Reggie Hayes

    Or

    DiPace/Sanborn/Delhomme


  10. #46

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by RougaWhite&Blue View Post
    Did DaBoot also go to archbishop Rummel? Was he in the special academic tract many athletes take?
    Nope .. just kept my eye on CF when we first started recruiting him .. many lsu fans wanted him too . Just Check out Tiger dropping back then .

    Kids a gamer

  11. #47

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DaBoot View Post
    What in the world does my statement have to do with ZC

    This goes back to last year
    Lots of people were delusional think BW was actually a QB
    Bad decision to let that guy play ( last year ) instead of developing CF
    Because you said it was a bad take because CF came in cold, as if no one's ever done that. So stating that ZC also came in cold and performed. It's not a difficult thing to understand.

  12. #48

    Default Re: Doubters still ?

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler View Post
    Because you said it was a bad take because CF came in cold, as if no one's ever done that. So stating that ZC also came in cold and performed. It's not a difficult thing to understand.
    Everyone can see what their lying eyes are telling them right? Fields has been in this program for 5 years. The last 3 games he started were as good as he has played and we didn't lose because of him, but we only won 1 game because we were able to run the football on ULM. Now Boot and a few others would have you believe had he started from the first game of the season, we would have won a few more games. My answer is simple, the QB position was not the reason we lost some of those games. When you can't run the football and stop the run defensively, we are simply not going to win many games. Zeon gave as much needed help in providing an extra threat to the offense's running game. He ran for over 600 yards in 6 games. Fields could not give us that dynamic, neither did Ben. Both handled the job well, but they weren't similar to Levi. Revisionist history is wonderful for the Boot.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •