Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: JMU Lawsuit

  1. #1

    Default JMU Lawsuit

    Law firm to represent James Madison in dispute

    RICHMOND, Va. - The Virginia attorney general has hired a law firm to represent James Madison University regarding the NCAA's decision Wednesday not to grant the Dukes a waiver from a rule that prevents the unbeaten No. 18 football team from an automatic bowl berth.

    In a three-page letter, the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth LLC argues for James Madison's inclusion in bowl consideration based on its 10-0 record, No. 18 national ranking and unprecedented success in its twoyear process reclassifying from the Football Championship Subdivision to the Bowl Subdivision, the game's top tier.

    The letter said the school is prepared to file a lawsuit ''asserting that the bowl ban violates the antitrust and, potentially, other laws.''


  2. Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    I’m backing JMU


  3. #3

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    My biggest concern is JMU could very well be urinating on a forest fire backlash.

    I understand their point. But they signed up and agreed.


  4. #4

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    18. JMU 10 - 0.


  5. Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by Swamp View Post
    18. JMU 10 - 0.
    Curious how many of those ten will go bowling?

  6. #6

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    My biggest concern is JMU could very well be urinating on a forest fire backlash.

    I understand their point. But they signed up and agreed.
    It’s cute and all. But the attorney knows they have no shot. They’re doing this for their 15 minutes (gameday will obviously reference them tomorrow), alumni/school admiration and the hope it pays off in future clients.

  7. Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunSID View Post
    ...They’re doing this for their 15 minutes (gameday will obviously reference them tomorrow), ...
    Never let your 15 minutes flow under the bridge.

    Maximize your 15 minutes, its better than a bowl game.

  8. #8

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    The only reason they have gone this far with it is because they are undefeated. If they were 6-6 they wouldn’t be trying it.


  9. #9

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Curious how many of those ten will go bowling?
    Prob not one.

    Their streak doesn't end at 10 though. Last loss was 4th to last game of '22 season v Louisville. Accounting the same way we did with our longest Win streak in FBS, JMU has pulled off the same - 13 game win streak. We've been in D1-A since '71, not exactly sure. JMU has done in two years of FBS membership which took us a half century.

  10. #10

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    JMU 2023 sked:
    3 opponents already bowl eligibility.
    3 within 1 game
    1 within 2 games
    2 future opponents already elig.
    So 5 to 9.


  11. #11

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by RougaWhite&Blue View Post
    JMU 2023 sked:
    3 opponents already bowl eligibility.
    3 within 1 game
    1 within 2 games
    2 future opponents already elig.
    So 5 to 9.
    They schedule better. Plus the East is a tougher division to play in. Not sure it’s actually tougher on field opponents, but game day atmospheres blow the west away.

  12. #12

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by ZoomZoom View Post
    My biggest concern is JMU could very well be urinating on a forest fire backlash.

    I understand their point. But they signed up and agreed.
    Yes sir. This is a private university that gets 63% of its athletic budget from student fees. they are having no problem transitioning to the FBS because money is not a concern. Now I get it, they are undefeated and ranked so they want to be in a bowl and a possible playoff spot. But if they were losing this wouldn't even be discussed.

  13. #13

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    They are public, we all know private schools were "not a good fit" to join sunbelt


  14. #14

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Last year's tulane team had 8 bowl eligible opponents
    And those opponents went 4-4 in bowls
    This year's tulane team may only have 3
    Cajuns 13 win team had 3


  15. #15

    Default Re: JMU Lawsuit

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS View Post
    I’m backing JMU
    Dude, they agreed to the terms when they signed the contract.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •