No one's advocating we overpay our head coach slot here regardless of who's in the job. Its going to vary. But there's CUSA head coaches earning more than we're paying our head coach. What's done is done. No sense going back in time relitigating the hire. However its fair to argue the results in real time. Usually coaches need a 3 year sample size to establish their program. But this situation of taking over a winning program, continuing the 'cULture' program that was emphasized as an overriding factor in the hire? Year One results were somewhat understandable. Year Two? There is the more slippage in every direction. We're obviously becoming a middling Sunbelt team at best. We cannot afford to stay the course we're on because fans are not returning in big numbers for a middle of the road Sunbelt program. If we're serious about getting the football program in position of making the expanded CFP in near future, change is needed now.