I love the passion around this, but this isn't an easy problem to fix. If it was easy, the vast majority of the G5 schools in the country wouldn't be struggling with it.
I think the Hud references aren't applicable, because that situation is similar to what is going on at Texas State right now. Wondering in the desert for years/decades and finally having a taste of winning with an exciting product was/is the reason for the huge spike in attendance in both places. Think of it as a fad.
Now that the fad is over, what do we have. We actually have some good stuff to work with. We have taken that fad and made it into a very respectable string of success on the field. The product is a good to very good product. The marketing and presentation of that product isn't good. The environment (CF) for that product is in the bottom 10% in the country.
The thesis that Dr Maggard is working from is that the environment is the #1 issue impacting the overall product, and spending money on marketing and presentation is not going to generate a worthwhile ROI until it is fixed.
No one can say if he is right or wrong, but at least he has a strategy. We will know in 3-5 years if it was a correct one or not.