So JMU makes the standard move up deal. What’s the issue? Or program integrity goes by the wayside? If they don’t like it, go back to FCS.
JMU simply needs to honor their agreement and not whine.
So JMU makes the standard move up deal. What’s the issue? Or program integrity goes by the wayside? If they don’t like it, go back to FCS.
JMU simply needs to honor their agreement and not whine.
20-9 ULM over TX State in the 4th
TXST fans thinking “here we go again.”
Next week vs Georgia St. Is going to be a brawl...
Real reason I'm ____ed is because they're SBC.
Rankings, Bowls, good for national perception of the Belt
Especially with the momentum swing going to Marsha now.
Meanwhile fun in San Marcos…
“On the stream they said students three stuff at ULM after the pick six. Then the ULM pyers threw stuff and hit a student and was escorted out. Kid and Don had to go over and help cool things down.”
Texas State wins 21-20.
Hoax got in FG range at 22 seconds left but OPI called on the play.
TXST! Watched most of that game. It was fun.
They need to get bowling. They’ve been close so many times.
I’ll say it every time. Tommy Bowden is the old man from Disney’s “Up.”
Right. Terry.
You can’t go a game without the announcers mentioning both. Understandable.
Great point, agree.... but the point is not all of the blame can be 100pct placed at the ncaa's feet. I'm fine with the rule, but I always just like looking for loopholes as well, lol.
Technically the rule has to do with transfers not sitting out when they went from fbs to fcs and lower admittance standards in fcs, so it could be argued the ban should be four years as some of those players could still be there. Although in this case I wager jmu has tougher admittance standards than many other g5 and with the portal and no sitting out anyway that part should have been moot
Also the ulm 2005 scenario had other variables that this case does not have
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)