. . . my NIL transfer is not a tangent at all . . . what you get in most instances is not what you scheduled at the time . . . and thus when sports enthusiasts on sports message boards grade your scheduling by what you get as opposed to what you scheduled, and you can't do anything about it at that time, it will be found to not be a tangent . . .
He could have gotten an FCS game in about five minutes. TAMU-Commerce was looking. He knew that.
Just looked at our schedules from 1997 -2010, we played multiple P-5's (and AAC).
1997: Pittsburgh, Ok. St., Texas Tech, TAMU, Washington St., Tulane
1998: Arkansas, UCF, Tulane, Oklahoma St.
1999: Ok. St, Texas Tech, Houston, Washington St., Tulane
2000: Texas, Texas Tech, Tulane
2001: Minnesota, Arizona St, UCF
2002: TAMU, Minnesota, Houston, LSU, Arkansas
2003: South Carolina, Houston, Minnesota, Ok. St.
2004: Kansas St.
2005: Texas, UCF
2006: LSU, TAMU, Houston
2007: South Carolina, UCF, Tennessee
2008: Illinois, Kansas St.
2009: Kansas St, LSU, Nebraska
2010: Georgia, Ok. St, Ole Miss
I see a big drop off after we get to the Sunbelt, but even more starting the Hudspeth years....Why can't we get back to this type of scheduling?
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)